Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 1;127(19):3605-3613.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33668. Epub 2021 Jun 22.

Uptake of cancer risk management strategies among women who undergo cascade genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes

Affiliations

Uptake of cancer risk management strategies among women who undergo cascade genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes

Sukh Makhnoon et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Uptake of cancer risk management based on inherited predispositions, which encompasses bilateral mastectomy (BLM), bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), and intensified screening, is the primary motivation for cascade testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). However, long-term outcome data for cascade testers are lacking.

Methods: Medical records were abstracted for all unaffected women with pathogenic variants in HBOC genes from 2 cancer hospitals (2013-2019) with at least 1 year of follow-up to compare the uptake of surgery and screening between cascade and noncascade testers.

Results: Cascade testers (79.8%) were younger than noncascade testers (mean age, 37.6 vs 43.5 years; P = .002). Among women aged ≥40 years, 43% underwent BLM, and 71.6% underwent BSO, with no significant difference in uptake between cascade and noncascade testers. The mean time to BSO among cascade testers was shorter among women aged ≥40 years versus those aged <40 years (11.8 vs 31.9 months; P = .04); no such difference was observed among noncascade testers. Mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging rates were low in the recorded 6 years for both groups after genetic counseling.

Conclusions: Management uptake among cascade testers is high with rates comparable to those for unaffected BRCA-positive women. A large proportion of women act on cascade test results, and this represents a novel report of utilization of cancer management strategies.

Keywords: cancer; cascade genetic testing; outcome; screening; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Filtering of patients for the analysis (MD Anderson Cancer Center, 01/2013-05/2019; MD Anderson at Cooper University Health Care, 2013-2018).

References

    1. Tuffaha HW, Mitchell A, Ward RL, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of germ-line BRCA testing in women with breast cancer and cascade testing in family members of mutation carriers. Genet Med. 2018;20:985–994. - PubMed
    1. Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, et al. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;322:652–665. - PubMed
    1. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. Version 1.2020–December 14, 2019. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Accessed January 15, 2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf
    1. Tier 1 genomics applications and their importance to public health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed January 21, 2021. http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/implementation/toolkit/tier1.htm
    1. Lázaro P, Pérez de Isla L, Watts GF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a cascade screening program for the early detection of familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2017;11:260–271. - PubMed

Publication types