Comparative cognition in three understudied ungulate species: European bison, forest buffalos and giraffes
- PMID: 34158081
- PMCID: PMC8218502
- DOI: 10.1186/s12983-021-00417-w
Comparative cognition in three understudied ungulate species: European bison, forest buffalos and giraffes
Abstract
Background: Comparative cognition has historically focused on a few taxa such as primates, birds or rodents. However, a broader perspective is essential to understand how different selective pressures affect cognition in different taxa, as more recently shown in several studies. Here we present the same battery of cognitive tasks to two understudied ungulate species with different socio-ecological characteristics, European bison (Bison bonasus) and forest buffalos (Syncerus caffer nanus), and we compare their performance to previous findings in giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis). We presented subjects with an Object permanence task, Memory tasks with 30 and 60 s delays, two inference tasks based on acoustic cues (i.e. Acoustic inference tasks) and a control task to check for the use of olfactory cues (i.e. Olfactory task).
Results: Overall, giraffes outperformed bison and buffalos, and bison outperformed buffalos (that performed at chance level). All species performed better in the Object permanence task than in the Memory tasks and one of the Acoustic inference tasks (which they likely solved by relying on stimulus enhancement). Giraffes performed better than buffalos in the Shake full Acoustic inference task, but worse than bison and buffalos in the Shake empty Acoustic inference task.
Conclusions: In sum, our results are in line with the hypothesis that specific socio-ecological characteristics played a crucial role in the evolution of cognition, and that higher fission-fusion levels and larger dietary breadth are linked to higher cognitive skills. This study shows that ungulates may be an excellent model to test evolutionary hypotheses on the emergence of cognition.
Keywords: Acoustic cues; Bison; Bovids; Buffalo; Cognition; Giraffe; Memory; Object permanence; Test battery; Ungulate.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare we have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Quantity discrimination in 9 ungulate species: Individuals take item number and size into account to discriminate quantities.Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105979. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105979. Epub 2024 Oct 14. Cognition. 2025. PMID: 39405641
-
Object permanence in Giraffa camelopardalis: First steps in giraffes' physical cognition.J Comp Psychol. 2019 May;133(2):207-214. doi: 10.1037/com0000142. Epub 2018 Oct 29. J Comp Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30372108
-
Giraffes go for more: a quantity discrimination study in giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis).Anim Cogn. 2021 May;24(3):483-495. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01442-8. Epub 2020 Oct 30. Anim Cogn. 2021. PMID: 33128196
-
Individual personality differences in goats predict their performance in visual learning and non-associative cognitive tasks.Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 8. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 27514774 Review.
-
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009. PMID: 19673160 Review.
Cited by
-
Giraffes make decisions based on statistical information.Sci Rep. 2023 May 4;13(1):5558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32615-3. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37142606 Free PMC article.
-
Selection of Mice for Object Permanence Cognitive Task Solution.Neurol Int. 2022 Aug 29;14(3):696-706. doi: 10.3390/neurolint14030058. Neurol Int. 2022. PMID: 36135993 Free PMC article.
-
Innovation across 13 ungulate species: problem solvers are less integrated in the social group and less neophobic.Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 12;290(1996):20222384. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2384. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Proc Biol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37015274 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beach FA. The Snark was a Boojum. Am Psychol. 1950;5:115–24. doi: 10.1037/h0056510. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources