Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 30;33(2):159-167.
doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.02.04.

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: Current status and future directions

Affiliations

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: Current status and future directions

Jiahui Chen et al. Chin J Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Surgery is the most important and effective method for the treatment of gastric cancer. Since the first gastrectomy in the early 19th century, surgical treatment of gastric cancer has undergone more than 100 years of development. With the increasing understanding of gastric cancer and the promotion of a series of clinical trials, the concept of gastric cancer surgery has evolved from the initial "bigger is better" to today's "standardized surgery" and is developing towards individualized surgery focusing on accurate resection and quality of life. This trend has had a tremendous impact on the development of surgical treatments, such as minimally invasive surgeries, function-preserving surgeries, and the optimal extent of lymph node dissection. Understanding the development and current status of gastric cancer surgery and exploring the remaining academic controversies are goals that every gastric surgeon should constantly pursue. However, how should gastric cancer surgery develop in the future? What opportunities and challenges will we encounter? In this review, we elaborate on the development and current status of gastric cancer surgery based on a series of clinical studies and discuss the controversy in the development of gastric cancer surgery.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; function-preserving surgery; lymph node dissection; minimally invasive surgery; review; surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sasako M, Saka M, Fukagawa T, et al Surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer: Japanese perspective. Dig Surg. 2007;24:101–7. doi: 10.1159/000101896. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Cutsem E, Sagaert X, Topal B, et al Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:2654–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30354-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Health Commission of The People’s Republic of China Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer 2018 (English version) Chin J Cancer Res. 2019;31:707–37. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.05.01. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topi S, Santacroce L, Bottalico L, et al Gastric cancer in history: A perspective interdisciplinary study. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:264. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020264. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources