Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 19;11(3):78-86.
doi: 10.1093/af/vfab020. eCollection 2021 May.

The origins of the domesticate brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) and its pathways to domestication

Affiliations
Review

The origins of the domesticate brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) and its pathways to domestication

Ardern Hulme-Beaman et al. Anim Front. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Map indicating the assumed native distribution of Rattus norvegicus (in blue) and locations of major rat domestication processes (marked with depictions). From East to West: Hooded rat depiction adapted from an image within the 1700s Japanese rodent breeding guide book, the Chinganso-date-gusa (1787); Rat-baiting dog depiction adapted from Mayhew (1851)London labor and the London poor illustrating blood sport activities from which European domestic rats arose; laboratory rat silhouette representing the postdomestication selective breeding of rats for laboratory inbred strain development at the Wistar Institute of Philadelphia in the early 1900s.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Panel of domestic rats. (A) Composite image of rat and mouse keeping cages from the Yoso-tama-no-kakehashi (1775) and four images of different color morphs of rats from the Chinganso-date-gusa (1787). (B) Rat-baiting event depicted from Mayhew (1851)London labor and the London poor. (C) Three female fancy rats displaying gregarious social behavior (photo credit Robert Lachlan).

References

    1. Aplin, K.P., Brown P.R., Jacob J., Krebs C.J., and Singleton G.R.. . 2003. Field methods for rodent studies in Asia and the Indo-Pacific: review of the major pest species. ACIAR Monograph series no. 100. Canberra (Australia): Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research; p. 397.
    1. Armitage, P.L. 1994. Unwelcome companions: ancient rats reviewed. Antiquity. 68:231–240. Available from: http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/Ant/068/0231/Ant0680231.pdf.
    1. Armitage, P.L., West B., and Steedman K.. . 1984. New evidence of black rat in Roman London. Lond. Archaeol. 4:375–383.
    1. Barnett, S.A. 1960. Social behaviour among tame rats and among wild-white hybrids. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 134(4):611–621.
    1. Barnett, S.A., and Stoddart R.C.. . 1969. Effects of breeding in captivity on conflict among wild rats. J. Mamm. 50:321–325.