MOF/Hip Fracture Ratio in a Belgian Cohort of Post-menopausal Women (FRISBEE): Potential Impact on the FRAX® Score
- PMID: 34159447
- DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00875-8
MOF/Hip Fracture Ratio in a Belgian Cohort of Post-menopausal Women (FRISBEE): Potential Impact on the FRAX® Score
Abstract
The ratio between major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and hip fractures in the Belgian FRAX® tool to predict fractures is currently based on Swedish data. We determined these ratios in a prospective cohort of Belgian postmenopausal women. 3560 women, aged 60-85 years (70.1 ± 6.4 years), were included in a prospective study from 2007 to 2013 and surveyed yearly (FRISBEE). We analyzed the number of validated incident fractures until October 2020 by age and sites and compared the MOFs/hip ratios in this cohort with those from the Swedish databases. We registered 1336 fractures (mean follow-up of 9.1 years). The MOFs/hip ratios extracted from the FRISBEE cohort were 10.7 [95% CI: (5.6-20.5)], 6.4 [4.7-8.7], and 5.0 [3.9-6.5] for women of 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89 years old, respectively. These ratios were 1.7-1.8 times higher for all age groups than those from the Swedish data, which decreased from 6.5 (60-64 years group) down to 1.8 (85-89 age group). The overall MOFs/hip ratio in Frisbee was 6.0 [5.9-6.1], which was higher than any Swedish ratio between 65 and 85 years. Nevertheless, the decrease of the ratios with age paralleled that observed in Sweden. In this Brussels prospective cohort, MOFs/hip ratios were 1.7-1.8 times those observed in Sweden currently used for MOFs prediction in the Belgian FRAX® version. This discrepancy can greatly modify the estimation of the risk of MOFs, which is among the main criteria used to recommend a pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis in several countries.
Keywords: Aging; FRAX; Fracture prediction; Hip fracture; MOF; Osteoporosis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Calibration of FRAX: A Journey, not a Destination.Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 Dec;109(6):597-599. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00891-8. Epub 2021 Jul 24. Calcif Tissue Int. 2021. PMID: 34304290 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kanis JA, Johansson H, Harvey NC, McCloskey EV (2019) A brief history of FRAX. Arch Osteoporos 13(1):118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0510-0 - DOI
-
- Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Johansson H, Kanis JA, McCloskey OA et al (2011) A FRAX model for the assessment of fracture probability in Belgium. Osteoporos Int 22:453–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1218-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A (2000) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170112 - DOI
-
- Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Sembo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmö. Osteoporos Int 11(8):669–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070064 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical