Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):721-729.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2373.

Long-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC5010 Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Long-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC5010 Randomized Clinical Trial

Hong Yang et al. JAMA Surg. .

Erratum in

  • Errors in a Figure.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Surg. 2022 Sep 1;157(9):859. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3765. JAMA Surg. 2022. PMID: 35921117 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: The prognosis of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains poor after surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has been shown to potentially improve survival.

Objective: To compare the treatment efficacy of NCRT plus surgery with surgery alone for long-term survival among patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Design, setting, and participants: The Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer 5010 study was a multicenter open-label randomized phase 3 clinical trial that enrolled patients between June 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014. Follow-up ended on December 31, 2019. The study was conducted at 8 centers in China. A total of 451 patients aged 18 to 70 years with thoracic ESCC stage T1-4N1M0/T4N0M0 were enrolled and randomized. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020.

Interventions: Patients randomized to receive NCRT plus surgery (NCRT group) received preoperative chemotherapy (25 mg/m2 of vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 and 75 mg/m2 of cisplatin on day 1 or 25 mg/m2 of cisplatin on days 1 to 4) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles and concurrent radiotherapy (40.0 Gy, administered in 20 fractions of 2.0 Gy for 5 days per week) followed by surgery. Patients randomized to receive surgery alone (surgery group) underwent surgery after randomization.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary end point was disease-free survival.

Results: A total of 451 patients (mean [SD] age, 56.5 [7.0] years; 367 men [81.4%]) were randomized to the NCRT (n = 224) and surgery (n = 227) groups and were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. By December 31, 2019, 224 deaths had occurred. The median follow-up was 53.5 months (interquartile range, 18.2-87.4 months). Patients receiving NCRT plus surgery had prolonged overall survival compared with those receiving surgery alone (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57-0.97; P = .03), with a 5-year survival rate of 59.9% (95% CI, 52.9%-66.1%) vs 49.1% (95% CI, 42.3%-55.6%), respectively. Patients in the NCRT group compared with the surgery group also had prolonged disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.80; P < .001), with a 5-year survival rate of 63.6% (95% CI, 56.0%-70.2%) vs 43.0% (95% CI, 36.0%-49.7%), respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, treatment with NCRT plus surgery significantly improved long-term overall survival and disease-free survival and therefore may be considered a standard of care for patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01216527.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT Flow Diagram
ESCC indicates esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; NCRT, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Overall Survival
Overall survival for the intention-to-treat population. HR indicates hazard ratio; NCRT, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Disease-Free Survival
Disease-free survival for patients with margin-zero resection. HR indicates hazard ratio; NCRT, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Comment in

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. . Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115-132. doi:10.3322/caac.21338 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herskovic A, Russell W, Liptay M, Fidler MJ, Al-Sarraf M. Esophageal carcinoma advances in treatment results for locally advanced disease: review. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(5):1095-1103. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr433 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al. ; CROSS Study Group . Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090-1098. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. ; Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group . Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):681-692. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data