Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253129.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253129. eCollection 2021.

Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles

Allison Langham-Putrow  1 , Caitlin Bakker  2 , Amy Riegelman  1
Affiliations

Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles

Allison Langham-Putrow et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Aims: Over the last two decades, the existence of an open access citation advantage (OACA)-increased citation of articles made available open access (OA)-has been the topic of much discussion. While there has been substantial research to address this question, findings have been contradictory and inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review to compare studies of citations to OA and non-OA articles.

Methods: A systematic search of 17 databases attempted to capture all relevant studies authored since 2001. The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework. We included studies with a direct comparison between OA and non-OA items and reported article-level citation as an outcome. Both randomized and non-randomized studies were included. No limitations were placed on study design, language, or publication type.

Results: A total of 5,744 items were retrieved. Ultimately, 134 items were identified for inclusion. 64 studies (47.8%) confirmed the existence of OACA, while 37 (27.6%) found that it did not exist, 32 (23.9%) found OACA only in subsets of their sample, and 1 study (0.8%) was inconclusive. Studies with a focus on multiple disciplines were significantly positively associated with finding that OACA exists in subsets, and are less associated with finding that OACA did not exist. In the critical appraisal of the included studies, 3 were found to have an overall low risk of bias. Of these, one found that an OACA existed, one found that it did not, and one found that an OACA occurred in subsets.

Conclusions: As seen through the large number of studies identified for this review, OACA is a topic of continuing interest. Quality and heterogeneity of the component studies pose challenges for generalization. The results suggest the need for reporting guidelines for bibliometrics studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flowchart.
PRISMA flowchart showing number of studies at each step of the selection process.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Risk of bias summary.
Summary of overall risk of bias findings (low or high) and in the population, data collection, study design, and results domains.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wellen R. Open access scholarly publishing and the problem of networks and intermediaries in the academic commons. 5th Frankfurt Scientific Symposium; Frankfurt am Main, DE. 2005.
    1. Fitzpatrick K. Giving it away: Sharing and the future of scholarly communication. Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 2012;43(4):347–62. doi: 10.1353/scp.2012.0019 - DOI
    1. Creaser C, White S. Trends in journal prices: an analysis of selected journals, 2000–2006. Learn Publ. 2008;21(3):214–24. doi: 10.1087/095315108x323866 - DOI
    1. Dingley B. U.S. Periodical Price Index 2005. 2005. [cited 6 Feb 2021]. Available from: www.ala.org/alcts/files/resources/collect/serials/ppi/05usppi.pdf.
    1. Greco A. Academic libraries and the economics of scholarly publishing in the twenty-first century: portfolio theory, product differentiation, economic rent, perfect price discrimination, and the cost of prestige. Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 2015;47(1):1–43. doi: 10.3138/jsp.47.1.01 - DOI

Publication types