Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;97(5):1150-1154.
doi: 10.1111/php.13477. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

Computer Modeling Indicates Dramatically Less DNA Damage from Far-UVC Krypton Chloride Lamps (222 nm) than from Sunlight Exposure

Affiliations

Computer Modeling Indicates Dramatically Less DNA Damage from Far-UVC Krypton Chloride Lamps (222 nm) than from Sunlight Exposure

Ewan Eadie et al. Photochem Photobiol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate, with computer modeling, the DNA damage (assessed by cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) formation) from far-ultraviolet C (far-UVC) in comparison with sunlight exposure in both a temperate (Harwell, England) and Mediterranean (Thessaloniki, Greece) climate. The research utilizes the published results from Barnard et al. [Barnard, I.R.M (2020) Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 36, 476-477] to determine the relative CPD yield of unfiltered and filtered far-UVC and sunlight exposure. Under current American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) exposure limits, 10 min of sunlight at an ultraviolet (UV) Index of 4-typical throughout the day in a temperate climate from Spring to Autumn-produces equivalent numbers of CPD as 700 h of unfiltered far-UVC or more than 30 000 h of filtered far-UVC at the basal layer. At the top of the epidermis, these values are reduced to 30 and 300 h, respectively. In terms of DNA damage induction, as assessed by CPD formation, the risk from sunlight exposure greatly exceeds the risk from far-UVC. However, the photochemistry that will occur in the stratum corneum from absorption of the vast majority of the high-energy far-UVC photons is unknown, as are the consequences.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Buonanno, M., D. Welch, I. Shuryak and D. J. Brenner (2020) Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses. Sci. Rep. 10, 1-8.
    1. Welch, D., M. Buonanno, V. Grilj, I. Shuryak, C. Crickmore, A. W. Bigelow, G. Randers-Pehrson, G. W. Johnson and D. J. Brenner (2018) Far-UVC light: A new tool to control the spread of airborne-mediated microbial diseases. Sci. Rep. 8, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21058-w
    1. Kitagawa, H., T. Nomura, T. Nazmul, O. Keitaro, N. Shigemoto, T. Sakaguchi and H. Ohge (2020) Effectiveness of 222-nm ultraviolet light on disinfecting SARS-CoV-2 surface contamination. Am. J. Infect. Control 49, 299-301.
    1. Kitagawa, H., T. Nomura, T. Nazmul, R. Kawano, K. Omori, N. Shigemoto, T. Sakaguchi and H. Ohge (2021) Effect of intermittent irradiation and fluence-response of 222 nm ultraviolet light on SARS-CoV-2 contamination. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 33, 102184.
    1. Fukui, T., T. Niikura, T. Oda, Y. Kumabe, H. Ohashi, M. Sasaki, T. Igarashi, M. Kunisada, N. Yamano, K. Oe, T. Matsumoto, T. Matsushita, S. Hayashi, C. Nishigori and R. Kuroda (2020) Exploratory clinical trial on the safety and bactericidal effect of 222-nm ultraviolet C irradiation in healthy humans. PLoS One 15, e0235948.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources