Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 7:12:678323.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.678323. eCollection 2021.

Enrichment of Autotrophic Denitrifiers From Anaerobic Sludge Using Sulfurous Electron Donors

Affiliations

Enrichment of Autotrophic Denitrifiers From Anaerobic Sludge Using Sulfurous Electron Donors

M F Carboni et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

This study compared the rates and microbial community development in batch bioassays on autotrophic denitrification using elemental sulfur (S0), pyrite (FeS2), thiosulfate (S2O3 2-), and sulfide (S2-) as electron donor. The performance of two inocula was compared: digested sludge (DS) from a wastewater treatment plant of a dairy industry and anaerobic granular sludge (GS) from a UASB reactor treating dairy wastewater. All electron donors supported the development of a microbial community with predominance of autotrophic denitrifiers during the enrichments, except for sulfide. For the first time, pyrite revealed to be a suitable substrate for the growth of autotrophic denitrifiers developing a microbial community with predominance of the genera Thiobacillus, Thioprofundum, and Ignavibacterium. Thiosulfate gave the highest denitrification rates removing 10.94 mM NO3 - day-1 and 8.98 mM NO3 - day-1 by DS and GS, respectively. This was 1.5 and 6 times faster than elemental sulfur and pyrite, respectively. Despite the highest denitrification rates observed in thiosulfate-fed enrichments, an evaluation of the most relevant parameters for a technological application revealed elemental sulfur as the best electron donor for autotrophic denitrification with a total cost of 0.38 € per m3 of wastewater treated.

Keywords: enrichment; microbial diversity; nitrogen removal; pyrite; reduced sulfur compounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Profile of NO3 (•) and SO42– (▲) of the last transfer in (A) ThEnr with DS, (B) ThEnr with GS, (C) PyEnr with DS, (D) PyEnr with GS, (E) S0Enr with DS, and (F) S0Enr with GS.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of measured and theoretical sulfate concentrations for all enrichments: (A) first incubation with the inocula and (B) last transfer with the enrichments.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Relative abundance at genus level present in the (A) inocula—in duplicate—and (B) in the last transfer of ThEnr, PyEnr, and S0Enr—in triplicate.

References

    1. Almasri M. N., Kaluarachchi J. J. (2004). Assessment and management of long-term nitrate pollution of ground water in agriculture-dominated watersheds. J. Hydrol. 295 225–245. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.013 - DOI
    1. Angly F. E., Dennis P. G., Skarshewski A., Vanwonterghem I., Hugenholtz P., Tyson G. W. (2014). CopyRighter: a rapid tool for improving the accuracy of microbial community profiles through lineage-specific gene copy number correction. Microbiome 2:11. 10.1186/2049-2618-2-11 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. APHA (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edn. Washington DC: American Public Health Association.
    1. Berg J. S., Schwedt A., Kreutzmann A. C., Kuypers M. M. M., Milucka J. (2014). Polysulfides as intermediates in the oxidation of sulfide to sulfate by Beggiatoa sp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80 629–636. 10.1128/AEM.02852-13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blazewicz S., Barnard R., Daly R., Firestone M. K. (2013). Evaluating rRNA as an indicator of microbial activity in environmental communities: limitations and uses. ISME J. 7 2061–2068. 10.1038/ismej.2013.102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed