Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 23;12(1):99-127.
doi: 10.1039/d0sc04620e.

Molecular reactivity of thiolate-protected noble metal nanoclusters: synthesis, self-assembly, and applications

Affiliations
Review

Molecular reactivity of thiolate-protected noble metal nanoclusters: synthesis, self-assembly, and applications

Qiaofeng Yao et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

Thiolate-protected noble metal (e.g., Au and Ag) nanoclusters (NCs) are ultra-small particles with a core size of less than 3 nm. Due to the strong quantum confinement effects and diverse atomic packing modes in this ultra-small size regime, noble metal NCs exhibit numerous molecule-like optical, magnetic, and electronic properties, making them an emerging family of "metallic molecules". Based on such molecule-like structures and properties, an individual noble metal NC behaves as a molecular entity in many chemical reactions, and exhibits structurally sensitive molecular reactivity to various ions, molecules, and other metal NCs. Although this molecular reactivity determines the application of NCs in various fields such as sensors, biomedicine, and catalysis, there is still a lack of systematic summary of the molecular interaction/reaction fundamentals of noble metal NCs at the molecular and atomic levels in the current literature. Here, we discuss the latest progress in understanding and exploiting the molecular interactions/reactions of noble metal NCs in their synthesis, self-assembly and application scenarios, based on the typical M(0)@M(i)-SR core-shell structure scheme, where M and SR are the metal atom and thiolate ligand, respectively. In particular, the continuous development of synthesis and characterization techniques has enabled noble metal NCs to be produced with molecular purity and atomically precise structural resolution. Such molecular purity and atomically precise structure, coupled with the great help of theoretical calculations, have revealed the active sites in various structural hierarchies of noble metal NCs (e.g., M(0) core, M-S interface, and SR ligand) for their molecular interactions/reactions. The anatomy of such molecular interactions/reactions of noble metal NCs in synthesis, self-assembly, and applications (e.g., sensors, biomedicine, and catalysis) constitutes another center of our discussion. The basis and practicality of the molecular interactions/reactions of noble metal NCs exemplified in this Review may increase the acceptance of metal NCs in various fields.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the active sites of noble metal NCs for their interactions/reactions with ions, molecules, and other NCs. The crystal structure of [Au25(SR)18] (SR = thiolate ligand) was redrawn as a demonstrative example based on the reported crystallography data, in which only one SR–[Au(i)–SR]2 motif is shown for clarity.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of adsorption and activation of (a) –CO, (b) O2, and (c) solvated H+ on the Au13 core of [Au25(SR)18] (a, b) or Au12Pt core of [Au24Pt(SR)18]2− (c). SR in (a) is –S-C2H4Ph (colour code: pink, core Au(0); blue, motif Au(i); golden, S; grey, C). SR in (b) is –S-CH3; two SR–[Au(i)–SR]2 motifs are removed for co-adsorption of O2 and CO (colour code: golden, Au; yellow, S; grey, C; light grey, H; red, O). The solvent molecules in (c) are tetrahydrofuran (THF) (colour code: golden, Au; red, Pt; yellow, S; green, H; light grey, C). (a) is reproduced with permission from ref. 91. Copyright 2010, Elsevier. (b) is reproduced with permission from ref. 43. Copyright 2010, Springer Nature. (c) is reproduced with permission from ref. 97. Copyright 2017, the Authors, published by Springer Nature.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of (a) inter-cluster aurophilic interaction, (b) ligand exchange reaction, and (c) surface motif exchange reaction based on the Au–S interface of Au25(SR)18 (a), [Au25(SR)18] (b), and [Au23(SR)16] (c). (a) shows the formation of a 1D assembly by Au25(SR)18 based on the inter-cluster aurophilic interaction (colour code: golden, Au; red, S); reproduced with permission from ref. 106. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (b) illustrates the preferential ligand exchange site on [Au25(S-C2H4Ph)18] by HS-Ph-p-Br based on its crystal structure (top panel) and solvent-accessibility surface model (bottom panel), where blue arrows indicate the solvent-exposed Au and red arrows indicate the preferential ligand exchange site (colour code: orange, Au; yellow, S; grey, C; red, Br); reproduced with permission from ref. 107. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (c) shows surface motif exchange induced size conversion from [Au23(SR)16] to [Au25(SR)18]; the glowing belts #1–#3 indicate SR–[Au(i)–SR]2 motifs formed in the size conversion process; reproduced with permission from ref. 61. Copyright 2018, the Authors, published by Springer Nature.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Schematic illustration of (a) 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) conjugation reaction, (b) ion-pairing reaction, and (c) CH–π interaction occurring on the SR ligands of metal NCs. (a) illustrates the EDC conjugation between folic acid (FA) and Au22(SG)18 (SG = glutathione ligand), where the –NH2 groups of SG ligands are protected by benzyl chloroformate (CBz) prior to the EDC reaction; reproduced with permission from ref. 122. Copyright 2017, Wiley-VCH. (b) illustrates the production of amphiphilic Au25(MHA)18@xCTA NCs (x = 6–9) by the phase-transfer-driven ion-pairing reaction, where MHA denotes 6-mercaptohexanoic acid and CTA denotes cetyltrimethylammonium; reproduced with permission from ref. 129. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. (c) exhibits inter-cluster CH–π interactions (top panel) and the “herringbone pattern” of –S-Nap ligands in the supercrystals of Au103S2(S-Nap)41 NCs, where HS-Nap denotes 2-naphthalenethiol (colour code: light blue, motif Au(i); yellow, S; light grey, H; blue/magenta, C); reproduced with permission from ref. 55. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (a) Schematic illustration (top panel) and UV-vis absorption spectra (bottom panel) of size growth from [Au25(SR)18] to [Au44(SR)26]2−via the CO-reduction method, where magenta arrows indicate the characteristic absorption of [Au25(SR)18] and [Au44(SR)26]2− (colour code: golden, Au; purple, S). (b) ESI-MS spectra of [Au25(SR)18CO] adducts identified in the [Au25(SR)18] solution saturated by CO. (a) and (b) are reproduced with permission from ref. 49. Copyright 2017, the Authors, published by Springer Nature. (c) Schematic illustration of the formation of Au38(SR)24 by the fusion of two Au25(SR)18 NCs. (d) Time-dependent UV-vis absorption and the corresponding absorption-derivative spectra of the size growth of Au38(SR)24 by the fusion of two Au25(SR)18 NCs. (c) and (d) are reproduced with permission from ref. 148. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. (a) Schematic illustration of the formation of Au25Ag2(SR)18 by adding two additional Ag atoms to [Au25(SR)18]; reproduced with permission from ref. 156. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. (b) ESI-MS spectra of Au25−xMx(SR)18 formed by reacting [Au25(SR)18] with the corresponding M(i)–SR/M(ii)–SR complexes (M = Ni, Pd, Pt, Cu, Ag, Cd, and Hg); reproduced with permission from ref. 58. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. (c) ESI-MS spectra of [Ag44(p-MBA)30]4− reacted with Au(i)-(p-MBA) at different feeding ratios of Ag44 : Au(i); L denotes the protecting ligand; reproduced with permission from ref. 60. Copyright 2017, the Authors, published by Springer Nature. (d) HPLC spectra of Au38−xAgx(SR)24 formed by cluster-metal complex reaction (CMCR) and co-reduction of metal ions (CRMI) at different reaction times; reproduced with permission from ref. 59. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. (a) Schematic illustration of the dimerization of [Au25(SR)18] through bridging Ag atoms to form Ag2Au50(SR)36 (colour code: green, core Au(0); cyan, motif Au(i); yellow, S; red, Ag); reproduced with permission from ref. 187. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH. (b) Schematic illustration of the formation of nanoribbons by inter-cluster aurophilic interactions between Au NCs: structural anatomy of [Au25(SR)18] (i), smaller-sized Au NCs formed by surface rearrangement of [Au25(SR)18] (ii) and their self-assembly into nanoribbons (iii) (colour code: golden, core Au(0); black, motif Au(i); light grey, S); reproduced with permission from ref. 108. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. (c) Structural model of partially protonated Au102(p-MBA)44 (i); TEM image (ii), electron tomographic model (iii), and cartoon structural model (iv) of spherical capsids formed by Au102(p-MBA)44; TEM image of hexagonal close packed (HCP) layered architectures formed by Au102(p-MBA)44 (v); the arrows in (i) indicate the orientations of p-MBA ligands; the insets of (v) are the high resolution TEM image (top panel) and packing model (bottom panel) of HCP layered architectures; reproduced with permission from ref. 128 and 189. Copyright 2016 and 2017, respectively, Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. (a) Packing structure, (b) H-bonds, and (c) mechanical response of protonated [Ag44(p-MBA)30]4− in its triclinic supercrystals; the top panel in (b) illustrates H-bonds in a typical double-bundle of p-MBA ligands, while the bottom panel exhibits H-bonds within (horizontal direction) and between (vertical direction) the crystalline layers; V and V0 in (c) are the volume and initial volume of supercrystals, respectively; (a)–(c) are reproduced with permission from ref. 190. Copyright 2014, Springer Nature. (d) Formation diagram of the octahedral and concave-octahedral supercrystals by deprotonated [Ag44(p-MBA)30]4− in a range of Cs+ concentrations and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) fractions in the crystallization solution; reproduced with permission from ref. 191. Copyright 2015, Wiley-VCH. (e) Schematic illustration of intra- (blue dashed lines) and inter-cluster (yellow dashed lines) CH–π interactions between two [Au52Cu72(S-Ph-p-CH3)55]+ NCs approaching in an edge-to-edge fashion in their supercrystals, where a triangular mosaic pattern of –S-Ph-p-CH3 ligands can be identified (colour code: pink/golden, Au/Cu; yellow, S; grey/magenta/orange, C; light grey, H); reproduced with permission from ref. 17. Copyright 2020, the Authors, published by Springer Nature.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. (a) UV-vis absorption (dotted lines) and emission (solid lines, λex = 350 nm) spectra of Ag12(SG)10 in the presence (black lines) and absence (blue lines) of Hg2+; insets are digital photos of Ag12(SG)10 in the presence (#2) and absence (#1) of Hg2+ under UV light; (b) schematic illustration of the metallophilic interaction between Hg2+ and Ag12(SG)10 that can quench cluster luminescence; (c) matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectra of Ag12(SG)10 in the presence (black line) and absence (blue line) of Hg2+; (d) digital photos of Ag12(SG)10 in the presence of varied metal cations under UV light (365 nm); (a)–(d) are reproduced with permission from ref. 47. Copyright 2012, Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) Schematic illustration of the detection mechanism of cysteine (Cys) by Ag16(SG)9 NCs; (f) relative emission intensity and digital photos of Ag16(SG)9 NCs in the presence of 20 natural amino acids; reproduced with permission from ref. 216. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10. Proposed catalytic mechanism of styrene oxidation by [Au25(SR)18] in the presence of varied oxidants: BuOOH, O2, and a mixture of them. Colour code: grey, core Au(0); light grey, motif Au(i); SR ligands are omitted for clarity. Reproduced with permission from ref. 244. Copyright 2010, Wiley-VCH.
None
Qiaofeng Yao
None
Zhennan Wu
None
Zhihe Liu
None
Yingzheng Lin
None
Xun Yuan
None
Jianping Xie

References

    1. Daniel M.-C. Astruc D. Chem. Rev. 2003;104:293–346. doi: 10.1021/cr030698+. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen P.-C. Liu M. Du J. S. Meckes B. Wang S. Lin H. Dravid V. P. Wolverton C. Mirkin C. A. Science. 2019;363:959–964. doi: 10.1126/science.aav4302. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jin R. Zeng C. Zhou M. Chen Y. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:10346–10413. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00703. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chakraborty I. Pradeep T. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:8208–8271. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00769. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Du Y. Sheng H. Astruc D. Zhu M. Chem. Rev. 2019;120:526–622. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00726. - DOI - PubMed