Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 11;12(6):2189-2197.
doi: 10.1039/d0sc05022a.

Hydroxy-bridged resting states of a [NiFe]-hydrogenase unraveled by cryogenic vibrational spectroscopy and DFT computations

Affiliations

Hydroxy-bridged resting states of a [NiFe]-hydrogenase unraveled by cryogenic vibrational spectroscopy and DFT computations

Giorgio Caserta et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

The catalytic mechanism of [NiFe]-hydrogenases is a subject of extensive research. Apart from at least four reaction intermediates of H2/H+ cycling, there are also a number of resting states, which are formed under oxidizing conditions. Although not directly involved in the catalytic cycle, the knowledge of their molecular structures and reactivity is important, because these states usually accumulate in the course of hydrogenase purification and may also play a role in vivo during hydrogenase maturation. Here, we applied low-temperature infrared (cryo-IR) and nuclear resonance vibrational spectroscopy (NRVS) to the isolated catalytic subunit (HoxC) of the heterodimeric regulatory [NiFe]-hydrogenase (RH) from Ralstonia eutropha. Cryo-IR spectroscopy revealed that the HoxC protein can be enriched in almost pure resting redox states suitable for NRVS investigation. NRVS analysis of the hydrogenase catalytic center is usually hampered by strong spectral contributions of the FeS clusters of the small, electron-transferring subunit. Therefore, our approach to investigate the FeS cluster-free, 57Fe-labeled HoxC provided an unprecedented insight into the [NiFe] site modes, revealing their contributions in a spectral range otherwise superimposed by FeS cluster-derived bands. Rationalized by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, our data provide structural descriptions of the previously uncharacterized hydroxy- and water-containing resting states. Our work highlights the relevance of cryogenic vibrational spectroscopy and DFT to elucidate the structure of barely defined redox states of the [NiFe]-hydrogenase active site.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (Left) Schematic representation of the subunit composition of the RH and the proposed catalytic cycle of [NiFe]-hydrogenases. The states involved in the H2 transformation include the Nia–S intermediate that presumably binds H2 in the bridging position between the nickel and the iron ions. H2 splitting results in a two-electron reduced Nia–SR state characterized by a bridging hydride. Release of one electron and one proton results in a hydride-carrying Nia–C species, which is a tautomeric form of the Nia–L state. Release of another electron and a further proton restores the Nia–S intermediate. Protonation of a terminal cysteine as well as the bridging hydride are highlighted in red. The Ni and its oxidation state are depicted in green. (Right) Schematic representation of the [NiFe]-hydrogenase large subunit HoxC and proposed structures of its resting states. The as-isolated HoxC protein occurs in a mixture of the Nir–SI and Nir–SII species. One-electron oxidation results in the formation of the Nir–B′′ species. Protonation of the terminal cysteine, as found for the Nia–SR and the light-induced Nia–L intermediates (left panel), and the OH/H2O active site ligands assigned in this work are depicted in bold case letters.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. IR spectra of HoxCai, HoxCox and RH (top to bottom) taken at 283 K and 85 K. (a) IR spectral region characteristic of CO and CN stretching modes recorded at 283 K. The spectrum of HoxCai exhibits spectral contributions of the Nir–SI (red) and Nir–SII (dark blue) resting states, respectively. The spectrum of RH is dominated by signals attributed to the Nia–S state (labeled in black). The IR data of HoxCox comprise contributions from two paramagnetic oxidized Nir–B′ (minor species) and Nir–B′′ states labeled in purple and blue, respectively. (b) IR spectral region characteristic of CO and CN stretching modes recorded at 85 K for the same samples. Contributions from the corresponding CN absorptions of Fe(CN)63− and Fe(CN)62− present in the chemically oxidized HoxCox were subtracted for the sake of clarity.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. DFT models: (a) Nir–SSHμOH of the reduced Nir–SI state, (b) of the reduced Nir–SII state, and (c) Nir–BSHμOH of the oxidized Nir–B′′ state, displaying the [NiFe] cofactor metal ligands and their contacts with the nearby side chains in HoxC. For alternative models and the entire HoxC homology model employed, see Fig. S4–S10.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. NRVS partial vibrational density of states (PVDOS) of 57Fe-labeled RH (bottom) and its large subunit HoxC (top), in their isolated forms, normalized to an integrated PVDOS of 3. Different spectral regions are indicated with arrows using the following color code: red, bands related to Fe–CO/CN of the [NiFe] active site; orange, bands related to [NiFe] site/protein modes; blue, bands related to Fe–μS modes involving bridging cysteines; olive, bands related to the Fe–S modes of the [4Fe4S]-clusters. Representative bands in the RH and HoxC spectra are labeled with numbers in black. The corresponding NRVS data including the error bars are presented in Fig. S20.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Comparison of the experimental NRV spectrum of the HoxCai sample (Nir–SI, grey trace reiterated in (a–e)) overlaid with the corresponding DFT-calculated 57Fe-PVDOS bands using alternative [NiIIFeII] models, schematically shown on the right side of the spectra. The DFT spectra derived using either protonated (solid lines) or deprotonated (broken lines) Cys479 are shown for the following models: (a) best-fit Nir–SSHμOH and Nir–SS−μOH (Fig. S6†); (c) and (Fig. S8†); (d) and (Fig. S9†); (e) and (Fig. S10†). The DFT spectrum derived from the alternative hydroxy model with protonated Cys60, Nir–SCys60-SHμOH, is highlighted in (b). Both μOH models in (a) reproduce the experimental data in the Fe–CO/CN region above 400 cm−1. Minor differences in the low-frequency spectral region around 180 cm−1 (Fig. S16†) strengthen the Nir–SSHμOH model, in line with the better prediction of the experimental IR absorptions for the CO and CN stretching modes (Fig. S11a†).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Comparison of the experimentally observed and DFT-calculated 57Fe-PVDOS bands in the 400–650 cm−1 spectral region for HoxCai and HoxCox. Experimental spectra (top: red trace, HoxCai; blue trace, HoxCox) are compared to their DFT-calculated counterparts based on the corresponding models that contain either protonated (middle: Nir–SSHμOH and Nir–BSHμOH states) or deprotonated Ni-bound terminal cysteine (bottom: Nir–SS−μOH and Nir–BS−μOH states). Bands calculated using Nir–SSHμOH and Nir–BSHμOH models are in better agreement with the NRVS data, including their shift magnitudes marked in the figure. The corresponding NRVS data including the error bars are presented in Fig. S20.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Arrow-style representation of important Fe/Ni–μOH vibrational modes from representative DFT models for the Nir–SI (model Nir–SSHμOH, top) and Nir–B′′ (model Nir–BSHμOH, bottom) states. The corresponding vibrational energies (cm−1) are indicated in the top left of each panel. Left to right: Ni–μOH–Fe wagging, Fe–μOH stretching, and Ni–μOH stretching modes. The stick-style mode intensities relevant to the interpretation of the 57Fe-PVDOS spectra are marked in Fig. S18b and S19b–d. Animations of these and other normal modes are available as part of the ESI.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lubitz W. Ogata H. Rüdiger O. Reijerse E. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:4081–4148. doi: 10.1021/cr4005814. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shafaat H. S. Rüdiger O. Ogata H. Lubitz W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2013;1827:986–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.01.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tombolelli D. Mroginski M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123:3409–3420. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b00617. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ash P. A. Hidalgo R. Vincent K. A. ACS Catal. 2017;7:2471–2485. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03182. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans R. M. Brooke E. J. Wehlin S. A. M. Nomerotskaia E. Sargent F. Carr S. B. Phillips S. E. V. Armstrong F. A. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016;12:46–50. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1976. - DOI - PubMed