Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;9(10):905.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.107.

The modern approach to esophageal palliative and emergency surgery

Affiliations
Review

The modern approach to esophageal palliative and emergency surgery

Anny Godin et al. Ann Transl Med. 2021 May.

Abstract

Thoracic surgeons currently have multiple options and strategies to guide treatment in esophageal palliative and emergency conditions. To guide the selection of an individualized palliative approach, physicians, including thoracic surgeons, must take into consideration many factors including prognosis, performance status and comorbidities of patients. For dysphagia more specifically, esophageal stent placement is the most widely used intervention for rapidly relieving dysphagia in inoperable esophageal cancer patients. The combination of esophageal stent placement with other therapies has an impact on palliative care. Innovations including radioactive stents, drug-eluding stents and biodegradable stents will require further evaluation and validation studies. Currently, patients with inoperable esophageal cancer have access to oncological and biological therapies that are improving their prognosis. A shift toward restaging and potential curative intent is occurring in current clinical practice. In acute intrathoracic esophageal perforation cases, high index of suspicion, multidisciplinary team expertise, antibiotics and hybrid treatment strategies, have significantly improved outcomes of patients in recent years. Hybrid treatment strategies denote the combination of minimally invasive interventions for source control and endoluminal procedures to seal the esophageal perforation. Endoluminal procedures as treatment of acute intrathoracic esophageal perforation include stent placement, over-the-scope clip and endoluminal vacuum therapy. Future perspective in the management of esophageal perforation seems to be the combination of endoluminal therapies tailored to the specific clinical scenario. Thoracic surgeons benefit from mastering endoluminal therapies and advanced endoscopic techniques. An understanding of these rapidly evolving therapies, i.e., outcomes, limitations and innovations, is required to optimally manage esophageal palliative and emergency conditions.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; dysphagia; emergency; palliation; perforation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.107). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Esophageal stent placement as palliative approach to dysphagia. Endoscopic view of an esophageal stent placement in a patient with dysphagia secondary to esophageal cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tracheoesophageal fistula at the left mainstem bronchus caused by invading esophageal cancer following EBRT. Bronchoscopic view of the membranous part of the left mainstem bronchus of a patient with tracheoesophageal fistula after EBRT. EBRT, external beam radiotherapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Double stenting approach of a tracheoesophageal fistula. Patient with tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal and tracheal stents: (A) lateral images chest X-ray; (B) lateral images CT-scan thorax.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Over-the-scope clips in an acute intrathoracic esophageal perforation. Patient with iatrogenic esophageal perforation and a prior chest surgery: (A) endoscopic images of over-the-scope clip placement; the same patient after endoluminal procedure; (B) antero-posterior images chest X-ray.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2241-52. 10.1056/NEJMra035010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Temel JS, Greer JA, El-Jawahri A, et al. Effects of Early Integrated Palliative Care in Patients With Lung and GI Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:834-41. 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5046 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Opstelten JL, de Wijkerslooth LR, Leenders M, et al. Variation in palliative care of esophageal cancer in clinical practice: factors associated with treatment decisions. Dis Esophagus 2017;30:1-7. - PubMed
    1. Siersema PD. New developments in palliative therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:959-78. 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.07.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blazeby JM, Williams MH, Brookes ST, et al. Quality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer. Gut 1995;37:505-8. 10.1136/gut.37.4.505 - DOI - PMC - PubMed