Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;9(10):907.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.66.

Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery

Affiliations
Review

Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery

Luigi Bonavina. Ann Transl Med. 2021 May.

Abstract

The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate. Among specific factors that may contribute to failure of the esophageal anastomosis are the absence of serosa layer, longitudinal orientation of muscle fibers, and ischemia of the gastric conduit. It has recently been suggested that the gut microbiome may influence the healing process of the anastomosis through the presence of collagenolytic bacterial strains, indicating that suture breakdown is not only a matter of collagen biosynthesis. The esophagogastric anastomosis can be performed either in the chest or neck, and can be completely hand-sewn, completely stapled (circular or linear stapler), or semi-mechanical (linear stapler posterior wall and hand-sewn anterior wall). Because of the lack of randomized clinical trials, no conclusive evidence is available, and the debate between the hand-sewn and the stapling technique is still ongoing even in the present era of robotic surgery. Centralization of care has improved the overall postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy, but the esophagogastric anastomosis remains the Achille's heel of the procedure. More research and network collaboration of experts is needed to improve safety and clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Esophagectomy; anastomotic leak; anastomotic stricture; circular stapler; esophagogastric anastomosis; linear stapler.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.66). The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Goense L, Meziani J, Ruurda JP, et al. Impact of postoperative complications on outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2019;106:111-9. 10.1002/bjs.11000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, et al. The impact of severe anastomotic leak on long-term survival and cancer recurrence after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy. Ann Surg 2015;262:972-80. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:1154-60; discussion 1160-1. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.045 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mine S, et al. Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2016;30:4279-85. 10.1007/s00464-015-4743-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 2010;101:527-33. 10.1002/jso.21510 - DOI - PubMed