Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;10(2):803-818.
doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00262-3. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

Confirmed 6-Month Disability Improvement and Worsening Correlate with Long-term Disability Outcomes in Alemtuzumab-Treated Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Post Hoc Analysis of the CARE-MS Studies

Affiliations

Confirmed 6-Month Disability Improvement and Worsening Correlate with Long-term Disability Outcomes in Alemtuzumab-Treated Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Post Hoc Analysis of the CARE-MS Studies

Samuel F Hunter et al. Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: In the 2-year CARE-MS trials (NCT00530348; NCT00548405) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, alemtuzumab showed superior efficacy versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a. Efficacy was maintained in two consecutive extensions (NCT00930553; NCT02255656). This post hoc analysis compared disability outcomes over 9 years among alemtuzumab-treated patients according to whether they experienced confirmed disability improvement (CDI) or worsening (CDW) or neither CDI nor CDW.

Methods: CARE-MS patients were randomized to receive two alemtuzumab courses (12 mg/day; 5 days at baseline; 3 days at 12 months), with additional as-needed 3-day courses in the extensions. CDI or CDW were defined as ≥ 1.0-point decrease or increase, respectively, in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score from core study baseline confirmed over 6 months, assessed in patients with baseline EDSS score ≥ 2.0. Improved or stable EDSS scores were defined as ≥ 1-point decrease or ≤ 0.5-point change (either direction), respectively, from core study baseline. Functional systems (FS) scores were also assessed.

Results: Of 511 eligible patients, 43% experienced CDI and 34% experienced CDW at any time through year 9 (patients experiencing both CDI and CDW were counted in each individual group); 29% experienced neither CDI nor CDW. At year 9, patients with CDI had a -0.58-point mean EDSS score change from baseline; 88% had stable or improved EDSS scores. Improvements occurred across all FS, primarily in sensory, pyramidal, and cerebellar domains. Patients with CDW had a +1.71-point mean EDSS score change; 16% had stable or improved EDSS scores. Patients with neither CDI nor CDW had a -0.10-point mean EDSS score change; 98% had stable or improved EDSS scores.

Conclusion: CDI achievement at any point during the CARE-MS studies was associated with improved disability at year 9, highlighting the potential of alemtuzumab to change the multiple sclerosis course. Conversely, CDW at any point was associated with worsened disability at year 9.

Keywords: Alemtuzumab; Confirmed disability improvement; Confirmed disability worsening; Disease-modifying therapy; Expanded Disability Status Scale; Functional systems; Multiple sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Disposition of pooled CARE-MS I and II patients stratified by 6-month CDI, 6-month CDW, or neither CDI nor CDW over 9 years. CDI and CDW were defined as a ≥ 1.0-point decrease and a ≥ 1.0-point increase, respectively, in EDSS score from core study baseline confirmed over 6 months, and were assessed only in patients with EDSS score ≥ 2.0 at core study baseline. Patients who experienced both CDI and CDW events during the 9-year period were counted in both groups. CDI confirmed disability improvement, CDW confirmed disability worsening, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
EDSS scores over 9 years in patients stratified by a 6-month CDI, b 6-month CDW, or c neither CDI nor CDW. Line charts represent EDSS scores through 9 years and bar charts represent improvement or stability in EDSS scores at year 9 relative to core study baseline, both in pooled CARE-MS I and II patients who had 6-month CDI, 6-month CDW, or neither CDI nor CDW at any time during the 9-year study. CDI and CDW were defined as a ≥ 1.0-point decrease and a ≥ 1.0-point increase, respectively, in EDSS score from core study baseline confirmed over 6 months, and were assessed only in patients with EDSS score ≥ 2.0 at core study baseline. Improved and stable EDSS scores were defined as ≥ 1-point decrease and ≤ 0.5-point change in either direction, respectively, from core study baseline at a single time point (year 9), and did not require confirmation over time. CDI confirmed disability improvement, CDW confirmed disability worsening, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
FS scores over 6 years in patients stratified by a 6-month CDI, b 6-month CDW, or c neither CDI nor CDW. Includes pooled CARE-MS I and II patients who had 6-month CDI, 6-month CDW, or neither CDI nor CDW at any time during the 9-year study. CDI and CDW were defined as a ≥ 1.0-point decrease and a ≥ 1.0-point increase, respectively, in EDSS score from core study baseline confirmed over 6 months, and were assessed only in patients with EDSS score ≥ 2.0 at core study baseline. FS scores were collected through the end of the CARE-MS extension (year 6), and were not recorded in the TOPAZ extension (years 7–9). Improved and stable FS scores were defined as ≥ 1-point decrease and ≤ 1-point change in either direction, respectively, from core study baseline at a single time point (year 6), and did not require confirmation over time. Sum of percentages with improved and stable FS scores may differ due to rounding. CDI confirmed disability improvement, CDW confirmed disability worsening, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale, FS functional systems

References

    1. Conradsson D, Ytterberg C, von Koch L, Johansson S. Changes in disability in people with multiple sclerosis: a 10-year prospective study. J Neurol. 2018;265(1):119–126. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8676-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sutliff MH. Contribution of impaired mobility to patient burden in multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(1):109–119. doi: 10.1185/03007990903433528. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chalmer TA, Baggesen LM, Norgaard M, et al. Early versus later treatment start in multiple sclerosis: a register-based cohort study. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(10):1262–e110. doi: 10.1111/ene.13692. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stankiewicz JM, Weiner HL. An argument for broad use of high efficacy treatments in early multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7(1):e636. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000636. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harding K, Williams O, Willis M, et al. Clinical outcomes of escalation vs early intensive disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(5):536–41. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4905. - DOI - PMC - PubMed