Physical Restraints in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Longitudinal Point Prevalence Study
- PMID: 34166295
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005111
Physical Restraints in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Longitudinal Point Prevalence Study
Abstract
Objectives: We elucidate to investigate the prevalence of and factors associated with the use of physical restraints among critically ill or injured children in PICUs.
Design: This was a multicenter, longitudinal point prevalence study.
Setting: We included 26 PICUs in Japan.
Patients: Included children were 1 month to 10 years old. We screened all admitted patients in the PICUs on three study dates (in March, June, and September 2019).
Intervention: None.
Measurements and main results: We collected prevalence and demographic characteristics of critically ill or injured children with physical restraints, as well as details of physical restraints, including indications and treatments provided. A total of 398 children were screened in the participating PICUs on the three data collection dates. The prevalence of children with physical restraints was 53% (211/398). Wrist restraint bands were the most frequently used means (55%, 117/211) for potential contingent events. The adjusted odds of using physical restraint in patients 1-2 years old was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.3-4.0) compared with children less than 1 year old. When looking at the individual hospital effect, units without a prespecified practice policy for physical restraints management or those with more than 10 beds were more likely to use physical restraints.
Conclusions: The prevalence of physical restraints in critically ill or injured children was high, and significant variation was observed among PICUs. Our study findings suggested that patient age, unit size, and practice policy of physical restraint could be associated with more frequent use of physical restraints.
Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
International Comparisons of ICU Treatment: What Can We Learn Together?Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):1991-1993. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005159. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 34643581 No abstract available.
References
-
- Maccioli GA, Dorman T, Brown BR, et al.; American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the maintenance of patient physical safety in the intensive care unit: Use of restraining therapies—American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2001-2002. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31:2665–2676
-
- Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare: Constitution of Japan. Chapter 3: Rights and Duties of the People (No. 34). [Japanese]. Available at: https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail... . Accessed July 27, 2020
-
- Kandeel NA, Attia AK. Physical restraints practice in adult intensive care units in Egypt. Nurs Health Sci. 2013; 15:79–85
-
- Van Rompaey B, Elseviers MM, Schuurmans MJ, et al. Risk factors for delirium in intensive care patients: A prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2009; 13:R77
-
- Mehta S, Cook D, Devlin J, et al. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of delirium in mechanically ventilated adults. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43:557–566
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
