Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;75(7):1594-1606.
doi: 10.1111/evo.14293. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

The evolution of coevolution in the study of species interactions

Affiliations

The evolution of coevolution in the study of species interactions

Anurag A Agrawal et al. Evolution. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

The study of reciprocal adaptation in interacting species has been an active and inspiring area of evolutionary research for nearly 60 years. Perhaps owing to its great natural history and potential consequences spanning population divergence to species diversification, coevolution continues to capture the imagination of biologists. Here we trace developments following Ehrlich and Raven's classic paper, with a particular focus on the modern influence of two studies by Dr. May Berenbaum in the 1980s. This series of classic work presented a compelling example exhibiting the macroevolutionary patterns predicted by Ehrlich and Raven and also formalized a microevolutionary approach to measuring selection, functional traits, and understanding reciprocal adaptation between plants and their herbivores. Following this breakthrough was a wave of research focusing on diversifying macroevolutionary patterns, mechanistic chemical ecology, and natural selection on populations within and across community types. Accordingly, we breakdown coevolutionary theory into specific hypotheses at different scales: reciprocal adaptation between populations within a community, differential coevolution among communities, lineage divergence, and phylogenetic patterns. We highlight progress as well as persistent gaps, especially the link between reciprocal adaptation and diversification.

Keywords: Chemical ecology; evolutionary ecology; microevolution-macroevolution; plant-herbivore interactions; reciprocal natural selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

LITERATURE CITED

    1. Adams, D. C., & Nason, J. D. (2018). A phylogenetic comparative method for evaluating trait coevolution across two phylogenies for sets of interacting species. Evolution, 72(2), 234-243.
    1. Agrawal, A. A., & Fishbein, M. (2008). Phylogenetic escalation and decline of plant defense strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(29), 10057-10060. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802368105
    1. Agrawal, A. A., Fishbein, M., Halitschke, R., Hastings, A. P., Rabosky, D. L., & Rasmann, S. (2009a). Evidence for adaptive radiation from a phylogenetic study of plant defenses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(43), 18067-18072. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904862106
    1. Agrawal, A. A., Hastings, A. P., Johnson, M. T. J., Maron, J. L., & Salminen, J.-P. (2012). Insect herbivores drive real-time ecological and evolutionary change in plant populations. Science, 338(6103), 113-116. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225977
    1. Agrawal, A. A., Petschenka, G., Bingham, R. A., Weber, M. G., & Rasmann, S. (2012). Toxic cardenolides: Chemical ecology and coevolution of specialized plant-herbivore interactions. New Phytologist, 194(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04049.x

Publication types