Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar-Apr;98(2):147-154.
doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?

Affiliations

Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?

Marina Faistauer et al. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) on the age at diagnosis, beginning of treatment, and first cochlear implant surgery.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study with children up to 12 years old with bilateral hearing loss were divided into two groups: patients who underwent UNHS and the ones who didn't. The groups were compared according to their age at the beginning of the evaluation at a specialized center, at the beginning of the intervention, and, for the ones who had indication, at the cochlear implant surgery. The group who underwent UNHS was divided between the ones who passed the screening test and the ones who didn't. They were compared according to their ages at the same moments as the first two groups.

Results: 135 patients were included. The median age at the first appointment in a specialized center was 1.42 (0.50 and 2.50) years, at the beginning of treatment 2.00 (1.00 and 3.52) years, and the cochlear implant surgery 2.83 (1.83 and 4.66) years. Children who underwent UNHS were younger than those who didn't, at the three evaluated moments (p < 0.001). In a subanalysis, children who passed the UNHS but were later diagnosed with hearing loss reached the first appointment with a specialist and started treatment older than those who failed the tests.

Conclusion: Performing UNHS interfered with the timing of deafness diagnosis and treatment. However, children who passed the screening but were later diagnosed with hearing loss were the category with the most important delay.

Keywords: Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Neonatal hearing screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Histograms comparing groups 1 and 2 with age (in months) at first consultation at a specialized center, at beginning of treatment, and at first cochlear implant.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Boxplot comparing children who passed with those who failed at the UNHS (groups a and b) in regard to ages (in months) at first specialist consultation, at beginning of treatment and at first cochlear implant surgery.

References

    1. Nikolopoulos TP. Neonatal hearing screening: What we have achieved and what needs to be improved. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:635–637. - PubMed
    1. Ciorba A, Corazzi V, Negossi L, Tazzari R, Bianchini C, Aimoni C. Moderate-severe hearing loss in children: A diagnostic and rehabilitative challenge. J Int Adv Otol. 2017;13:407–413. - PubMed
    1. Ravi R, Gunjawate DR, Yerraguntla K, Lewis LE, Driscoll C, Rajashekhar B. Follow-up in newborn hearing screening – a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;90:29–36. - PubMed
    1. Brasil. Lei no 12.303, de 3 de agosto de 2010. Dispõe sobre a obrigatoriedade de realização do exame denominado Emissões Otoacústicas Evocadas. Diário Oficial da União, seção 1, p. 1, 2010. 2010 https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/7190457/pg-1-secao-1-diario-oficial....
    1. Lewis DR, Marone SA, Mendes BC, Cruz OL, de Nóbrega M. Multiprofessional committee on auditory health - COMUSA. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76:121–128. - PMC - PubMed