Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 18:16:1823-1833.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S308922. eCollection 2021.

A Novel Model-Based Questionnaire Based on Low-Dose CT Screening Data for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Diagnosis in Shimane, Japan

Affiliations

A Novel Model-Based Questionnaire Based on Low-Dose CT Screening Data for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Diagnosis in Shimane, Japan

Akari Tanino et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. .

Abstract

Purpose: Although there have been many reports on the use of respiratory function tests and questionnaires for creating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) questionnaires, there have been no reports on the effectiveness of questionnaires using computed tomography (CT) screening data. We aimed to validate the International Primary Care Airways Group (IPAG) questionnaire and to propose a novel COPD screening questionnaire based on the CT screening data of Japanese participants.

Patients and methods: Low-dose CT screening was performed for early detection of lung cancer and COPD since 2009 in Shimane, Japan, and clinical information was collected using an original questionnaire that included all the IPAG questionnaire items and eight additional items (for eg, on dyspnea) during CT screening. Participants with emphysema, smoking history, and respiratory symptoms were instructed to undergo a respiratory function test. The participants with the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.7 on the respiratory function test were diagnosed with COPD, and 11,458 participants underwent CT screening from 2013 to 2016 and were enrolled and filtered using <22.5 pack-years. Data from 3252 participants were selected for the final analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve determined the best cutoff points for discriminating patients with COPD. The efficacy of the questionnaire items was determined using logistic regression analysis.

Results: The best cutoff point for the Japanese IPAG questionnaire was 23. The logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences in the question items of "age", "pack-year", "cough", "phlegm", and "feeling of dyspnea". COPD-CT questionnaire was developed based on the CT screening data. The COPD predicted value was determined using the regression model obtained in this study.

Conclusion: The IPAG questionnaire had low specificity for discriminating COPD in Japanese patients. A novel questionnaire (COPD-CT) and the COPD predicted value based on the CT screening data was developed.

Keywords: Japanese population; pack-years; prediction model; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Akari Tanino reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Dr Ryosuke Tanino reports grants, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Dr Takeshi Isobe reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Protocol for CT screening in Shimane, Japan.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Questionnaire created by our department and used for CT screening in Shimane, Japan. IPAG questionnaire items represent the interview questions that are the same as in the IPAG questionnaire.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curve for pack-year (sample, n = 11,458). Area under ROC curve = 0.88588. A cut-off of 22.50 pack-year showed a sensitivity of 91.3% and a specificity of 73.0%.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curve for the COPD questionnaire of IPAG (subset sample, n = 3252). Area under ROC curve = 0.67648. A cut-off score of 23.00 showed a sensitivity of 60.4% and a specificity of 63.8%.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Menezes AMB, Perez-Padilla R, Jardim JB, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in five Latin American cities (the PLATINO study): a prevalence study. Lancet. 2005;366(9500):1875–1881. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67632-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buist AS, McBurnie MA, Vollmer WM, et al. International variation in the prevalence of COPD (The BOLD Study): a population-based prevalence study. Lancet. 2007;370(9589):741–750. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61377-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cigarette smoking and health. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153(2):861–865. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.153.2.8564146 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terzikhan N, Verhamme KMC, Hofman A, Stricker BH, Brusselle GG, Lahousse L. Prevalence and incidence of COPD in smokers and non-smokers: the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(8):785–792. doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0132-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fukuchi Y, Nishimura M, Ichinose M, et al. COPD in Japan: the Nippon COPD Epidemiology study. Respirology. 2004;9(4):458–465. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00637.x - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms