Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 5:15:100836.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100836. eCollection 2021 Sep.

A scoping review on the use of machine learning in research on social determinants of health: Trends and research prospects

Shiho Kino  1   2 , Yu-Tien Hsu  1 , Koichiro Shiba  3 , Yung-Shin Chien  1 , Carol Mita  4 , Ichiro Kawachi  1 , Adel Daoud  5   6   7   8
Affiliations

A scoping review on the use of machine learning in research on social determinants of health: Trends and research prospects

Shiho Kino et al. SSM Popul Health. .

Abstract

Background: Machine learning (ML) has spread rapidly from computer science to several disciplines. Given the predictive capacity of ML, it offers new opportunities for health, behavioral, and social scientists. However, it remains unclear how and to what extent ML is being used in studies of social determinants of health (SDH).

Methods: Using four search engines, we conducted a scoping review of studies that used ML to study SDH (published before May 1, 2020). Two independent reviewers analyzed the relevant studies. For each study, we identified the research questions, Results, data, and algorithms. We synthesized our findings in a narrative report.

Results: Of the initial 8097 hits, we identified 82 relevant studies. The number of publications has risen during the past decade. More than half of the studies (n = 46) used US data. About 80% (n = 66) utilized surveys, and 70% (n = 57) employed ML for common prediction tasks. Although the number of studies in ML and SDH is growing rapidly, only a few studies used ML to improve causal inference, curate data, or identify social bias in predictions (i.e., algorithmic fairness).

Conclusions: While ML equips researchers with new ways to measure health outcomes and their determinants from non-conventional sources such as text, audio, and image data, most studies still rely on traditional surveys. Although there are no guarantees that ML will lead to better social epidemiological research, the potential for innovation in SDH research is evident as a result of harnessing the predictive power of ML for causality, data curation, or algorithmic fairness.

Keywords: Machine learning; Review; Social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of literature search for scoping review on the traction of machine learning in the social determinants of health.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trend in the number of included studies by themes in machine learning.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abarca-Alvarez F.J., Reinoso-Bellido R., Campos-Sánchez F.S. Decision model for predicting social vulnerability using artificial intelligence. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2019;8(12):575.
    1. Abirami M. A classification model to predict onset of smoking and drinking habits based on socio-economic and sociocultural factors. J Amb Intel Hum Comp. 2020:1–9.
    1. Adeyinka D.A., Olakunde B.O., Muhajarine N. Evidence of health inequity in child survival: Spatial and bayesian network analyses of stillbirth rates in 194 countries. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahern J., Balzer L., Galea S. The roles of outlet density and norms in alcohol use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2015;151:144–150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahern J. Racial/ethnic differences in the role of childhood adversities for mental disorders among a nationally representative sample of adolescents. Epidemiology. 2016;27(5):697–704. - PubMed

Publication types