Diagnostic Accuracy of Suspected Appendicitis: A Comparative Analysis of Misdiagnosed Appendicitis in Children
- PMID: 34170096
- DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002323
Diagnostic Accuracy of Suspected Appendicitis: A Comparative Analysis of Misdiagnosed Appendicitis in Children
Abstract
Objective: When evaluating suspected appendicitis, limited data support quality benchmarks for negative appendectomy (NA); none exist for delayed diagnosis of appendicitis (DDA). The objectives of this study are the following: (1) to provide preliminary evidence supporting a quality benchmark for DDA and 2) to compare presenting features and diagnostic evaluations of children with NA and DDA with those with pathology-confirmed appendicitis (PCA) diagnosed during initial emergency department (ED) encounter.
Methods: Secondary analysis of data from a QI project designed to reduce the use computed tomography when evaluating suspected appendicitis using a case-control design. Patients undergoing appendectomy in an academic tertiary care children's hospital system between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016 (n = 1,189) were eligible for inclusion in this case-control study. Negative appendectomy was defined as no pathologic change or findings consistent with a different diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis was defined as patients undergoing appendectomy within 7 days of a prior ED visit for a related complaint. Controls of PCA (n = 150) were randomly selected from all cases undergoing appendectomy.
Results: There were 42 NA (3.5%) and 31 DDA (2.6%). Cases of PCA and NA exhibited similar histories, examination findings, and underwent comparable diagnostic evaluations. Cases of PCA more frequently demonstrated a white blood cell count greater than 10 × 103/μL (85% vs 67%; P = 0.01), a left-shift (77% vs 45%; P < 0.001), and an ultrasound interpretation with high probability for appendicitis (73% vs 54%; P = 0.03). Numerous significant differences in history, examination findings, and diagnostic tests performed existed between cases of PCA and DDA.
Conclusions: Children with PCA and NA present similarly and undergo comparable evaluations resulting in appendectomy. A 3% to 4% NA rate may be unavoidable given these similarities. Presenting features in DDA significantly differ from those of PCA. An irreducible proportion of appendicitis diagnoses may be delayed.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest. S.S., L.B., and J.A.G. conceived the study and design. S.S., T.B., L.B., and J.A.G. acquired the data. S.S., J.L., L.B., and J.A.G. analyzed and interpreted the data. S.S., T.B., and J.A.G. drafted the article. J.B., L.B., and J.A.G. critical revised the article for important intellectual content. J.L. provided statistical expertise for data analysis.
References
-
- HCUP Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) . Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
-
- Chau DB, Ciullo SS, Watson-Smith D, et al. Patient-centered outcomes research in appendicitis in children: bridging the knowledge gap. J Pediatr Surg . 2016;51:117–121.
-
- Glerum KM, Selbst SM, Parikh PD, et al. Pediatric Malpractice Claims in the emergency department and urgent care settings from 2001 to 2015. Pediatr Emerg Care . 2018. [Epub ahead of print; PMID: 30211835].
-
- Sullins VF, Rouch JD, Lee SL. Malpractice in cases of Pediatric appendicitis. Clin Pediatr (Phila) . 2017;56:226–230.
-
- Lu Y, Friedlander S, Lee SL. Negative appendectomy: clinical and economic implications. Am Surg . 2016;82:1018–1022.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical