Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Oct;31(10):1866-1881.
doi: 10.1111/sms.14006. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

Effects of range of motion on resistance training adaptations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jesús G Pallarés  1 , Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte  1 , Alejandro Martínez-Cava  1 , Tomas Vetrovsky  2 , Michal Steffl  2 , Javier Courel-Ibáñez  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of range of motion on resistance training adaptations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jesús G Pallarés et al. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, there is a lack of consensus and high controversy about the most effective range of motion (ROM) to minimize the risk of injury and maximize the resistance training adaptations.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the scientific evidence examining the effects of full and partial ROM resistance training interventions on neuromuscular, functional, and structural adaptations.

Methods: The original protocol (CRD42020160976) was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database. Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles from the earliest record up to and including March 2021. The RoB 2 and GRADE tools were used to judge the level of bias and quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were performed using robust variance estimation with small-sample corrections.

Results: Sixteen studies were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analyses. Full ROM training produced significantly greater adaptations than partial ROM on muscle strength (ES = 0.56, p = 0.004) and lower-limb hypertrophy (ES = 0.88, p = 0.027). Furthermore, although not statistically significant, changes in functional performance were maximized by the full ROM training (ES = 0.44, p = 0.186). Finally, no significant superiority of either ROM was found to produce changes in muscle thickness, pennation angle, and fascicle length (ES = 0.28, p = 0.226).

Conclusion: Full ROM resistance training is more effective than partial ROM to maximize muscle strength and lower-limb muscle hypertrophy. Likewise, functional performance appears to be favored by the use of full ROM exercises. On the contrary, there are no large differences between the full and partial ROM interventions to generate changes in muscle architecture.

Keywords: health; injury; performance; range of movement; sport; strength training.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Lesinski M, Herz M, Schmelcher A, Granacher U. Effects of resistance training on physical fitness in healthy children and adolescents: an umbrella review. Sport Med. 2020;50:1901-1928.
    1. Lloyd RS, Faigenbaum AD, Stone MH, et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:498-505.
    1. Fragala MS, Cadore EL, Dorgo S, et al. Resistance training for older adults: position statement from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33:2019-2052.
    1. Hunter GR, McCarthy JP, Bamman MM. Effects of resistance training on older adults. Sport Med. 2004;34:329-348.
    1. Ciolac EG, Rodrigues-da-Silva JM. Resistance training as a tool for preventing and treating musculoskeletal disorders. Sport Med. 2016;46:1239-1248.

MeSH terms