Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;106(5):1043-1050.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003845. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

Hypothermic Machine Perfusion as a National Standard Preservation Method for Deceased Donor Kidneys

Aukje Brat  1 , Kirsten M de Vries  2 , Ernst W E van Heurn  3 , Volkert A L Huurman  4 , Wim de Jongh  5 , Henri G D Leuvenink  1 , Arjan D van Zuilen  6 , Bernadette J J M Haase-Kromwijk  2 , Jeroen de Jonge  7 , Stefan P Berger  8 , Sijbrand H Hofker  1
Affiliations

Hypothermic Machine Perfusion as a National Standard Preservation Method for Deceased Donor Kidneys

Aukje Brat et al. Transplantation. .

Abstract

Background: Recently, continuous nonoxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has been implemented as standard preservation method for deceased donor kidneys in the Netherlands. This study was designed to assess the effect of the implementation of HMP on early outcomes after transplantation.

Methods: Kidneys donated in the Netherlands in 2016 and 2017 were intended to be preserved by HMP. A historical cohort (2010-2014) preserved by static cold storage was chosen as the control group. Primary outcome was delayed graft function (DGF). Additional analyses were performed on safety, graft function, and survival up until 2 y after transplantation.

Results: Data were collected on 2493 kidneys. Analyses showed significantly more donation after circulatory death, preemptive transplantation, and retransplants in the project cohort. Of the 681 kidneys that were transplanted during the project, 81% were preserved by HMP. No kidneys were discarded due to HMP-related complications. DGF occurred in 38.2% of the project cohort versus 43.7% of the historical cohort (P < 0.001), with a significantly shorter duration within the project cohort (7 versus 9 d, P = 0.003). Multivariate regression analysis showed an odds ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.553-0.855) for the risk of DGF when using HMP compared with cold storage (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in kidney function, graft survival, and recipient survival up until 2 y posttransplantation.

Conclusions: This study showed that HMP as a standard preservation method for deceased donor kidneys is safe and feasible. HMP was associated with a significant reduction of DGF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Flowchart of all deceased donor kidneys included in this study. CS, cold storage; HMP, hypothermic machine perfusion.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Forest plot of the effect of the implementation of nonoxygenated HMP on the prevalence on DGF in different donor subgroups. CI, confidence interval; CS, cold storage; DBD, donation after brain death; DCD, donation after circulatory death; DGF, delayed graft function; ECD, expanded criteria donor; HMP, hypothermic machine perfusion; SCD, standard criteria donor.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clark EA, Opelz G, Mickey MR, et al. . Evaluation of Belzer and Collins kidney-preservation methods. Lancet. 1973;1:361–364. - PubMed
    1. Opelz G, Terasaki PI. Advantage of cold storage over machine perfusion for preservation of cadaver kidneys. Transplantation. 1982;33:64–68. - PubMed
    1. Belzer FO. Current methods of kidney storage. Cryobiology. 1969;5:444–446. - PubMed
    1. Meier-Kriesche HU, Port FK, Ojo AO, et al. . Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome. Kidney Int. 2000;58:1311–1317. - PubMed
    1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. . Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1725–1730. - PubMed