Endodontic procedures produce bacterial droplet contamination - but what about viruses?
- PMID: 34172915
- PMCID: PMC8226351
- DOI: 10.1038/s41432-021-0175-1
Endodontic procedures produce bacterial droplet contamination - but what about viruses?
Abstract
Research question The study aims to investigate spread, distance and spatial distribution of aerosolised microorganisms generated through various endodontic procedures.Study design A case-control study carried out at the University of Maryland, US in 2020. The study investigated the aerosolised microorganisms produced during three endodontic treatments: emergency pulpotomy, emergency pulpectomy and non-surgical root canal therapy (NSRCT), with 15 participants in each group (n = 45). Patients diagnosed with symptomatic apical periodontitis were included. The use of settle plates for passive air sampling was employed, in a 4 x 4 m room with closed doors. The number of colony-forming units (CFUs) and composition of bacterial species were analysed. Variables within the study included: distance of plate to patient's mouth (0.5 m or 2 m), positioning of plate (directly in front of or diagonal to the participant's mouth), type of endodontic treatment performed and the duration of treatment. A baseline sample was collected (room at rest) as a control. All dental treatment was carried out under rubber dam, after patients had undergone a pre-operative 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate mouth rinse for 60 seconds. An extraoral suction system (ADS EOS Dental System Inc; Ontario, CA, USA) was also placed directly in front of the patient's mouth throughout treatment.Results A significantly greater number of CFUs were recorded after endodontic treatments (all treatments), compared to negative control. CFUs were lower in the emergency pulpotomy group compared to the other two groups. There was a significantly lower number of CFUs found at plates situated 0.5 m, compared to 2 m, away from the patient. There was a positive correlation between the procedure duration and CFU count. The main bacterial species detected were Staphylococcus aureus (48.8%), Staphlococcus epidermidis (42.2%) and oral streptococci (33.1%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungi were not detected.Conclusion Emergency pulpectomy and NSRCT created greater microbial contamination than an emergency pulpotomy. Greater numbers of microorganisms were found after longer treatment times and closer to the patient's mouth.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Aerosols Generated during Endodontic Treatment: A Special Concern during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.J Endod. 2021 May;47(5):732-739. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Feb 3. J Endod. 2021. PMID: 33548332 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite in Dental Unit Waterline on Aerosolized Bacteria Generated from Endodontic Procedures.J Endod. 2022 Oct;48(10):1248-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Aug 27. J Endod. 2022. PMID: 36030970
-
Evaluation of aerosol contamination during debonding procedures.Angle Orthod. 2001 Aug;71(4):299-306. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0299:EOACDD>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2001. PMID: 11510639
-
Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study.J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):562-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120616. Epub 2013 Jul 15. J Periodontol. 2014. PMID: 23855840 Clinical Trial.
-
Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections.Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3:512-530. doi: 10.1111/iej.13677. Epub 2022 Jan 13. Int Endod J. 2022. PMID: 34958494 Review.
Cited by
-
How the high-volume evacuation alters the flow-field and particle removal characteristics in the mock-up dental clinic.Build Environ. 2021 Nov;205:108225. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108225. Epub 2021 Aug 6. Build Environ. 2021. PMID: 34376905 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Public Health England. COVID-19: infection prevention and control dental appendix. 2020. Available at (accessed March 2021).
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources