In reply: The capacity for consciousness and the clinical diagnosis of brain death: are we using the correct gold standard?
- PMID: 34173174
- DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-02047-6
In reply: The capacity for consciousness and the clinical diagnosis of brain death: are we using the correct gold standard?
Keywords: ancillary testing; brainstem death; consciousness.
Comment on
-
Flow is not perfusion, and perfusion is not function: ancillary testing for the diagnosis of brain death.Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;68(7):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01988-2. Epub 2021 May 4. Can J Anaesth. 2021. PMID: 33942244 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The capacity for consciousness and the clinical diagnosis of brain death: are we using the correct gold standard?Can J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;68(10):1576-1577. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02046-7. Epub 2021 Jun 14. Can J Anaesth. 2021. PMID: 34128201 No abstract available.
References
-
- Rady MY. The capacity for consciousness and the clinical diagnosis of brain death: are we using the correct gold standard? Can J Anesth 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02046-7 .
-
- Greer DM, Shemie SD, Lewis A, et al. Determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria: The World Brain Death Project. JAMA 2020; 324: 1078-97. - DOI
-
- Plourde G, Briard JN, Shemie SD, Shankar JJ, Chassé M. Flow is not perfusion, and perfusion is not function: ancillary testing for the diagnosis of brain death. Can J Anesth 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-01988-2 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources