Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Nov;69(11):3157-3166.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.17336. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

Telephone follow-up to reduce unplanned hospital returns for older emergency department patients: A randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Telephone follow-up to reduce unplanned hospital returns for older emergency department patients: A randomized trial

Merel van Loon-van Gaalen et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background/objectives: Telephone follow-up calls could optimize the transition from the emergency department (ED) to home for older patients. However, the effects on hospital return rates are not clear. We investigated whether telephone follow-up reduces unplanned hospitalizations and/or unplanned ED return visits within 30 days of ED discharge.

Design: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial with allocation by month; odd months intervention group, even months control group.

Setting: Two ED locations of a non-academic teaching hospital in The Netherlands.

Participants: Community-dwelling adults aged ≥70 years, discharged home from the ED were randomized to the intervention group (N = 4732) or control group (N = 5104).

Intervention: Intervention group patients: semi-scripted telephone call from an ED nurse within 24 h after discharge to identify post-discharge problems and review discharge instructions. Control group patients: scripted satisfaction survey telephone call.

Measurements: Primary outcome: total number of unplanned hospitalizations and/or ED return visits within 30 days of ED discharge.

Secondary outcomes: separate numbers of unplanned hospitalizations and ED return visits. Subgroup analysis by age, sex, living condition, and degree of crowding in the ED at discharge.

Results: Overall, 42% were males, and median age was 78 years. In the intervention group, 1516 of 4732 patients (32%) consented, and in the control group 1659 of 5104 (33%) patients. Unplanned 30-day hospitalization and/or ED return visit was found in 16% of intervention group patients and 14% of control group patients (odds ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.42). Also, no statistically significant differences were found in secondary outcome measures. Within the subgroups, the intervention did not have beneficial effects for the intervention group.

Conclusion: Telephone follow-up after ED discharge in older patients did not result in reduction of unplanned hospital admissions and/or ED return visits within 30 days. These results raise the question of whether other outcomes could be improved by post-discharge ED telephone follow-up.

Keywords: emergency department; geriatric; older patients; post-discharge follow-up; telephone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of enrollment and study groups. CG, control group; IG, intervention group; n, number. *Eight odd months during the study period; #9 even months during the study period
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Risk of unplanned hospitalization and/or ED return visit within 30 days, depending on the study group. CG, control group; CI, confidence interval; ED, emergency department; IG, intervention group; NEDOCS, National Emergency Department OverCrowding Scale. *Living condition unknown in 327 intervention group patients and 367 control group patients. ^NEDOCS at discharge unknown in 5 intervention group patients and 175 control group patients

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aminzadeh F, Dalziel WB. Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:238‐247. - PubMed
    1. Arendts G, Fitzhardinge S, Pronk K, Hutton M, Nagree Y, Donaldson M. Derivation of a nomogram to estimate probability of revisit in at‐risk older adults discharged from the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med. 2013;8:249‐254. - PubMed
    1. de Gelder J, Lucke JA, de Groot B, et al. Predictors and outcomes of revisits in older adults discharged from the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66:735‐741. - PubMed
    1. Biese KJ, Busby‐Whitehead J, Cai J, et al. Telephone follow‐up for older adults discharged to home from the emergency department: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66:452‐458. - PubMed
    1. Caplan GA, Brown A, Croker WD, Doolan J. Risk of admission within 4 weeks of discharge of elderly patients from the emergency department—the DEED study. Discharge of elderly from emergency department. Age Ageing. 1998;27:697‐702. - PubMed

Publication types