Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;55(1):200-208.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.27802. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

Four-Dimensional flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Pediatric Coarctation of the Aorta

Affiliations

Four-Dimensional flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Pediatric Coarctation of the Aorta

Lajja Desai et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) typically requires repair, but re-interventions and vascular complications occur, particularly with associated defects like bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may identify anatomic and hemodynamic factors contributing to clinical complications.

Purpose: To investigate 4D flow MRI characteristics in pediatric CoA to determine parameters for long-term clinical surveillance.

Study type: Retrospective.

Population: CoA (n = 21), CoA with BAV (n = 24), BAV alone (n = 29), and healthy control (n = 25).

Field strength/sequence: A 1.5 T, 3D CE IR FLASH MRA, 4D flow MRI using 3D time resolved PC-MRI with velocity encoding.

Assessment: Thoracic aorta diameters were measured from 3D CE-MRA. Peak systolic velocities and wall shear stress were calculated and flow patterns were visualized throughout the thoracic aorta using 4D flow. Repair characteristics, re-interventions, and need for anti-hypertensive medications were recorded.

Statistics: Descriptive statistics, ANOVA with post hoc t-testing and Bonferroni correction, Kruskal-Wallis H, intraclass correlation coefficient, Fleiss' kappa.

Results: Patients with CoA with or without repair had smaller transverse arch diameters compared to BAV alone and control cohorts (P < 0.05), higher peak systolic flow velocities and wall shear stress compared to controls in the transverse arch and descending aorta (P < 0.05), and flow derangements in the descending aorta. The most common CoA repairs were extended end-to-end anastomosis (n = 22/45, 48.9%, age at repair 1 ± 2 years, seven re-interventions) and stent/interposition graft placement (n = 10/45, 22.2%, age at repair 12 ± 3 years, one re-intervention). Anti-hypertensive medications were prescribed to 33.3% (n = 15/45) of CoA and 34.4% of BAV alone patients (n = 10/29).

Data conclusions: Despite repair, CoA alters hemodynamics and flow patterns in the transverse arch and descending aorta. These findings may contribute to vascular remodeling and secondary complications. 4D flow MRI may be valuable in risk stratification, treatment selection and postintervention assessment. Long-term, prospective studies are warranted to correlate patient and MRI factors with clinical outcomes.

Evidence level: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Keywords: 4D flow; cardiac; coarctation of the aorta; congenital heart disease; pediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
4D pathline images comparing flow patterns and maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of aortic peak systolic velocities in the ascending aorta (AAo), transverse arch (Arch), and descending aorta (DAo).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Ten regions were analyzed for wall shear stress in each cohort. Wall shear stress was increased in the coarctation group compared to controls in regions 5, 6, 7, and 8. Wall shear stress was increased in the coarctation + bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) group compared to BAV alone in regions 5 and 6.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Box plots with interquartile ranges of the max wall shear stress values for each aortic arch region and cohort. Wall shear stress was increased in the coarctation group compared to controls in regions 5–8. Wall shear stress was increased in the coarctation + bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) group compared to BAV alone in regions 5 and 6.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Diagram showing summary of results by aortic arch region. BAV = bicuspid aortic valve.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torok RD, Campbell MJ, Fleming GA, Hill KD. Coarctation of the aorta: Management from infancy to adulthood. World J Cardiol 2015;7: 765–775. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niaz T, Poterucha JT, Johnson JN, et al. Incidence, morphology, and progression of bicuspid aortic valve in pediatric and young adult subjects with coexisting congenital heart defects. Congenit Heart Dis 2017;129:261–269. - PubMed
    1. Sugimoto A, Ota N, Miyakoshi C, et al. Mid to long-term aortic valve related outcomes after conventional repair for patients with interrupted aortic arch or coarctation of the aorta combined with ventricular septal defect: The impact of bicuspid aortic valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014;46:952–960. - PubMed
    1. Connolly HM, Huston J, Brown RD Jr, Warnes CA, Ammash NM, Tajik AJ. Intracranial aneurysms in patients with coarctation of the aorta: A prospective magnetic resonance angiography study of 100 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78:1491–1499. - PubMed
    1. Brown ML, Burkhart HM, Connolly HM, et al. Coarctation of the aorta: Lifelong surveillance is mandatory following surgical repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;10(62):1020–1025. - PubMed

Publication types