Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022:268:393-403.
doi: 10.1007/164_2021_487.

Update on Type-1 Allergy Diagnostics

Affiliations

Update on Type-1 Allergy Diagnostics

Regina Treudler et al. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022.

Abstract

Diagnostics in type-1 allergy rely on medical history and clinical examination. Extent and severity of signs and symptoms can be documented by standardized scores and questionnaires. Both skin prick test and intradermal test are useful for search of immunoglobulin E-mediated sensitizations but the availability of commercially available diagnostic extracts has been markedly reduced during the last years. Investigation of total and of specific serum IgE is the most important in vitro diagnostic analyte in type-1 allergy. Identification of the individual molecules to which patients are sensitized, known as molecular or component-resolved diagnostics (CRD), has recently markedly improved management of type-1 allergy to pollen, food and hymenoptera venoms. Main features of CRD are increased analytic sensitivity, detection of cross-reactivity and determination of individual sensitization profiles which allow for risk assessment and facilitate decisions for or against allergen immunotherapy. Basophil activation test as well as determination of selected biomarkers (e.g. tryptase) may also be helpful in some cases. If any allergy test is positive, one will have to distinguish reactions, which are clinically relevant, from those, which are not. In vivo provocation tests (e.g. nasal provocation, oral drug or food challenge) may help to clarify the relevance of a sensitization.

Keywords: Component-resolved diagnostics; Diagnostics; Provocation test; Review; Skin prick test; Type-1 allergy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbas M, Moussa Mohamed, Akel Hassan (2020) Type 1 hypersensitivity reaction. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560561/
    1. Alvarado SA, Nassiri M, Bahna SL (2019) Scoring systems for allergies and asthma in clinical research and practice. Allergy Asthma Proc 40:93–102. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2019.40.4196 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ansotegui IJ, Melioli G, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Villa E, Ebisawa M, Passalacqua G, Savi E, Ebo D, Gómez RM, Luengo Sánchez O, Oppenheimer JJ, Jensen-Jarolim E, Fischer DA, Haahtela T, Antila M, Bousquet JJ, Cardona V, Chiang WC, Demoly PM, DuBuske LM, Ferrer Puga M, van Gerth WR, González Díaz SN, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Jares E, Kalpaklioğlu AF, Kase Tanno L, Kowalski ML, Ledford DK, Monge Ortega OP, Morais Almeida M, Pfaar O, Poulsen LK, Pawankar R, Renz HE, Romano AG, Rosário Filho NA, Rosenwasser L, Sánchez Borges MA, Scala E, Senna G-E, Sisul JC, Tang MLK, Thong BY-H, Valenta R, Wood RA, Zuberbier T (2020) IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper. World Allergy Organ J 13:100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100080 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Apfelbacher CJ, Jones CJ, Frew A, Smith H (2016) Validity of three asthma-specific quality of life questionnaires: the patients’ perspective. BMJ Open 6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011793
    1. Aurich S, Schüürmann M, Simon J-C, Treudler R (2017) Anaphylactic shock caused by intradermal testing with cefuroxime. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 15:668–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.13246 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources