Logistic advantage of two-step screening strategy for SARS-CoV-2 at airport quarantine
- PMID: 34174408
- PMCID: PMC8220861
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102127
Logistic advantage of two-step screening strategy for SARS-CoV-2 at airport quarantine
Abstract
Background: Airport quarantine is required to reduce the risk of entry of travelers infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, it is challenging for both high accuracy and rapid turn-around time to coexist in testing; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is time-consuming with high accuracy, while antigen testing is rapid with less accuracy. However, there are few data on the concordance between PCR and antigen testing.
Methods: Arrivals at three international airports in Japan between July 29 and September 30, 2020 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using self-collected saliva by a screening strategy with initial chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) followed by confirmatory nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) only for intermediate range antigen concentrations.
Results: Among the 95,457 persons entering Japan during the period, 88,924 (93.2%) were tested by CLEIA, and 0.29% (254/88,924) were found to be SARS-CoV-2 antigen positive (≥4.0 pg/mL). NAAT was required for confirmatory testing in 0.58% (513/88,924) with intermediate antigen concentrations (0.67-4.0 pg/mL) whereby the virus was detected in 6.6% (34/513). This two-step strategy reduced the utilization of NAAT to one out of every 173 test subjects. The estimated performance of this strategy did not show significant increase in false negatives as compared to performing NAAT in all subjects.
Conclusions: Point of care testing by quantitative CLEIA using self-collected saliva is less labor-intensive and yields results rapidly, thus suitable as an initial screening test. Reserving NAAT for CLEIA indeterminate cases may prevent compromising accuracy while significantly improving the logistics of administering mass-screening at large venues.
Keywords: CLEIA; COVID-19; PCR; Quarantine; SARS-CoV-2.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
IY reports a policy research grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Japan Tobacco Pharmaceutical Division, and Nippon Shinyaku, outside the submitted work. PYS reports personal fees from AYUMI Pharmaceutical, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, and Kyowa Kirin, outside the submitted work. TT reports policy research grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, and Bristol Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Kyowa Hakko Kirin, grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Novartis Pharma, grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Astellas Pharma, Teijin Pharma, Fuji Pharma, Nippon Shinyaku, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research), and the Center of Innovation Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency, and non-financial support from Janssen Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work.
Figures


References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous