Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 26;22(1):135.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01439-3.

General practitioners' perceived indicators of vulnerability in pregnancy- A qualitative interview study

L Brygger Venø  1 , D E Jarbøl  2 , L B Pedersen  2   3 , J Søndergaard  2 , R K Ertmann  4
Affiliations

General practitioners' perceived indicators of vulnerability in pregnancy- A qualitative interview study

L Brygger Venø et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore general practitioners' (GPs') perceived indicators of vulnerability among pregnant women in primary care.

Design: A qualitative study with semi-structured in-depth focus group interviews.

Setting: General practices located in a mixture of urban, semi-urban and rural practices throughout the Region of Southern Denmark SUBJECTS: Twenty GPs.

Main outcome measures: Through qualitative analysis with systematic text condensation of the interview data, the following themes emerged: (1) obvious indicators of vulnerability-i.e. somatic or psychological illnesses, or complex social problems and 2) intangible indicators of vulnerability - i.e. identification depended on the GPs' gut-feeling. From the GPs' perspective, the concept of vulnerability in pregnancy were perceived as the net result of risk factors and available individual and social resources, with a psychosocial etiology as the dominant framework.

Conclusions: The GPs demonstrated a broad variety of perceived indicators of vulnerability in pregnancy; most importantly, the GPs were aware of a group of pregnant women with intangible vulnerability mainly representing low resilience. Despite not fitting into the GPs' perceived concept of vulnerability, the GPs had a strong gut feeling that these women might be vulnerable. Misjudging the resources of pregnant women due to their physical appearance could delay the GPs' identification of vulnerability. Future studies should explore the challenges GPs experiences when assessing vulnerability among pregnant women.

Keywords: Antenatal care; General practice; Pregnancy; Vulnerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of GPs perceived indicators of vulnerability in pregnancy, relating to their obviousness
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Danskernes sundhed - Den nationale sundhedsprofil 2017 [The health of the danes - The national profile of health 2017]. Copenhagen 2018.
    1. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Anbefalinger for svangreomsorgen [Recommendations for pregnancy care], Danish. 2 ed. Copenhagen2013.
    1. Beck CT. Predictors of postpartum depression: an update. Nurs Res. 2001;50(5):275–285. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D Nielsen Forman, P Videbech, M Hedegaard, J DalbySalvig, Secher NJ. Postpartum depression: identification of women at risk. BJOG. 2000;107(10):1210–1217. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11609.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Hara MW, Wisner KL. Perinatal mental illness: definition, description and aetiology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(1):3–12. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources