Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):129.
doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00797-4.

Similar immunogenicity profiles between the proposed biosimilar MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine in patients with diabetes mellitus: the phase 3 INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 studies

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Similar immunogenicity profiles between the proposed biosimilar MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine in patients with diabetes mellitus: the phase 3 INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 studies

Bin Sun et al. BMC Endocr Disord. .

Abstract

Background: MYL-1501D is a proposed biosimilar to insulin glargine. The noninferiority of MYL-1501D was demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in 2 phase 3 trials. Immunogenicity of MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine was examined in both studies.

Methods: INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 were multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group studies. In INSTRIDE 1, patients with type 1 diabetes received MYL-1501D or insulin glargine over a 52-week period. In INSTRIDE 2, patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin naive or not, received MYL-1501D or reference insulin glargine over a 24-week period. Incidence rates and change from baseline in relative levels of antidrug antibodies (ADA) and anti-host cell protein (anti-HCP) antibodies in both treatment groups were determined by a radioimmunoprecipitation assay and a bridging immunoassay, respectively. Results were analyzed using a mixed-effects model (INSTRIDE 1) or a nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test (INSTRIDE 2).

Results: Total enrollment was 558 patients in INSTRIDE 1 and 560 patients in INSTRIDE 2. The incidence of total and cross-reactive ADA was comparable between treatment groups in INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 (P > 0.05 for both). A similar proportion of patients had anti-HCP antibodies in both treatment groups in INSTRIDE 1 at week 52 (MYL-1501D, 93.9 %; reference insulin glargine, 89.6 %; P = 0.213) and in INSTRIDE 2 at week 24 (MYL-1501D, 87.3 %; reference insulin glargine, 86.9 %; P > 0.999).

Conclusions: In INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2, similar immunogenicity profiles were observed for MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, respectively.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, INSTRIDE 1 ( NCT02227862 ; date of registration, August 28, 2014); INSTRIDE 2 ( NCT02227875 ; date of registration, August 28, 2014).

Keywords: Biosimilar; Diabetes mellitus; Immunogenicity; Insulin glargine; MYL-1501D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BS, CD, YR, PA, and AB are paid employees of Viatris Inc and may hold stock or stock options in the company. NS, AR, and SR are paid employees of Biocon Research Limited and may hold stock or stock options in the company. VW, ASR, and DP were employees of Biocon Research Limited during the time of the study and may hold stock or stock options in the company. RRB has served as a consultant for Viatris Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design of (a) INSTRIDE 1 and (b) INSTRIDE 2. T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fit plot of cross-reactive insulin antibody percent specific binding assays in (a) INSTRIDE 1 and (b) INSTRIDE 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Mean change in cross-reactive ADA by visit using the MYL-1501D assay in INSTRIDE 1a and b actual median cross-reactive ADA by visit using the MYL-1501D assay in INSTRIDE 2.b ADA, antidrug antibodies; BL, baseline; %SB, percentage specific binding. aError bars represent the SD. bError bars represent the interquartile range
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proportion of patients with a cross-reactive insulin antibody response using the MYL-1501D assay in (a) INSTRIDE 1 and (b) INSTRIDE 2
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean actual ECL ratio (anti-HCP antibodies) in (a) INSTRIDE 1 and (b) INSTRIDE 2. Error bars represent the SD. ECL ratio is defined as ECL/ECL at baseline. BL, baseline; ECL, enhanced electrochemiluminescence; HCP, host cell protein

References

    1. American Diabetes Association Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S11-24. - PubMed
    1. Daneman D. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;367:847–58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68341-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inzucchi SE, Sherwin RS. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. In: Goldman L, Shafer A, editors. Goldman’s Cecil medicine. 24th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. e78–94.
    1. American Diabetes Association Glycemic targets. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S48-56. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S64-74. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources