Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;45(9):2924-2937.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06188-z. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

The Association Between Treatment Interval and Survival in Patients With Colon or Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

The Association Between Treatment Interval and Survival in Patients With Colon or Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Ruud F W Franssen et al. World J Surg. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Surgery for colon or rectal cancer is associated with a high incidence of complications, especially in patients with a low aerobic fitness. Those patients might benefit from a comprehensive preoperative workup including prehabilitation. However, time between diagnosis and treatment is often limited due to current treatment guidelines. To date, it is unclear whether the treatment interval can be extended without compromising survival.

Methods: A systematic review concerning the association between treatment intervals and survival in patients who underwent elective curative surgery for colon or rectal cancer was performed. A search up to December 2020 was conducted in PubMed, Cinahl and Embase. Original research articles were eligible. Quality assessment was performed using the Downs and Black checklist.

Results: Eleven observational studies were included (897 947 patients). In colon cancer, treatment intervals that were statistically significant associated with reduced overall survival or cancer-specific survival ranged between > 30 and > 84 days. In rectal cancer, only one out of four studies showed that treatment intervals > 49 days was associated with reduced cancer-specific survival.

Conclusions: This systematic review identified that studies investigating the association between treatment intervals and survival are heterogeneous with regard to treatment interval definitions, treatment interval time intervals and used outcome measures. These aspects need standardization before a reliable estimate of an optimal treatment interval can be made. In addition, further research should focus on establishing optimal treatment intervals in patients at high risk for postoperative complications, as particularly these patients might benefit from extended diagnosis to treatment intervals permitting comprehensive preoperative preparation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All Authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram, displaying the selection of studies and reasons for exclusion

References

    1. Moug SJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the older person: A systematic review. Ann Med Surg Lond. 2015;4(3):311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.08.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braga M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg. 2002;236(6):759–766. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200212000-00008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaarrapportage 2018 DCRA. (2019). Available from https://dica.nl/jaarrapportage-2018/dcra.
    1. Davies SJ, et al. Measuring outcomes after major abdominal surgery during hospitalization: reliability and validity of the Postoperative Morbidity Survey. Perioper Med (Lond) 2013;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-2-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cienfuegos JA, et al. The impact of major postoperative complications on long-term outcomes following curative resection of colon cancer. Int J Surg. 2018;52:303–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources