The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults
- PMID: 34176015
- DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00954-1
The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults
Abstract
The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) has herein drafted clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis for the people of India. Implementation of the position statement in clinical practice is expected to improve the overall care of patients with osteoporosis in India.
Purpose: In India, osteoporosis is a major public health problem. However, in the absence of any robust regional guidelines, the screening, treatment, and follow-up of patients with osteoporosis are lagging behind in the country.
Methods: The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR), which is a multidisciplinary group of physicians, researchers, dietitians, and epidemiologists and who study bone and related tissues, in their annual meeting, drafted the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis that would be appropriate in a resource constraint setting like India.
Results: Diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in a patient with minimal trauma fracture without the aid of any other diagnostic tools. In others, bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry remains the modality of choice. Data indicates that osteoporotic fractures occur at an earlier age in Indians than in the West; hence, screening for osteoporosis should begin at an earlier age. FRAX can be used for fracture risk estimation; however, it may underestimate the risk of future fractures in our population and still needs validation. Maintaining optimum serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels is essential, which, in most cases, would require regular vitamin D supplementation. Pharmacotherapy should be guided by the presence/absence of vertebral/hip fractures or the severity of risk based on clinical factors, although bisphosphonates remain the first choice in most cases. Regular follow-up is essential to ensure adherence and response to therapy.
Conclusions: Implementation of the position statement in clinical practice is expected to improve the overall care of patients with osteoporosis in India.
Keywords: Fracture prevention; Guidelines; ISBMR; India; Osteoporosis.
References
-
- Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmö. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070064 - DOI
-
- Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK et al (1998) Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13:1915–1923. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.12.1915 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Roux C, Briot K (2020) The crisis of inadequate treatment in osteoporosis. Lancet Rheumatol 2:e110–e119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30136-5 - DOI
-
- Malhotra N, Mithal A (2008) Osteoporosis in Indians. Indian J Med Res 127:263–268 - PubMed
-
- Khadilkar A, Mandlik R (2015) Epidemiology and treatment of osteoporosis in women: an Indian perspective. Int J Womens Health 841. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S54623
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical