Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;29(12):7865-7875.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06270-1. Epub 2021 Jun 27.

Long-term improvement of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: supporting patient-physician communication by an electronic tool for inpatient and outpatient care

Affiliations

Long-term improvement of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: supporting patient-physician communication by an electronic tool for inpatient and outpatient care

Patricia Lindberg-Scharf et al. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The effectiveness of a pathway with quality of life (QoL) diagnosis and therapy has been already demonstrated in an earlier randomized trial (RCT) in patients with breast cancer. We refined the pathway by developing and evaluating an electronic tool for QoL assessment in routine inpatient and outpatient care.

Methods: In a single-arm study, patients with breast cancer with surgical treatment in two German hospitals were enrolled. QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) was measured with an electronic tool after surgery and during aftercare in outpatient medical practices (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months) so that results (QoL-profile) were available immediately. Feedback by patients and physicians was analyzed to evaluate feasibility and impact on patient-physician communication.

Results: Between May 2016 and July 2018, 56 patients were enrolled. Physicians evaluated the QoL pathway as feasible. Patients whose physician regularly discussed QoL-profiles with them reported significantly more often that their specific needs were cared for (p < .001) and that their physician had found the right treatment strategy for these needs (p < .001) compared with patients whose doctor never/rarely discussed QoL-profiles. The latter significantly more often had no benefit from QoL assessments (p < .001).

Conclusion: The QoL pathway with electronic QoL assessments is feasible for inpatient and outpatient care. QoL results should be discussed directly with the patient.

Clinical trial information: NCT04334096, date of registration 06.04.2020.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Complex intervention; Electronic assessment; Patient-physician communication; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Quality of life (QoL-) profile: woman with primary breast cancer, 49 years, married, one child, working. Prognostic classification pT1b(m), SN0, M0, G1, ER pos, PR pos, HER2 neg; breast-conserving surgical therapy with revision surgery after 1 month followed by radiation and anti-estrogen treatment. Red bar = cutoff for a need for QoL therapy (< 50 points)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Rates of patients with a need for quality of life (QoL) therapy (QoL < 50 points on at least one of ten scales) in the present sample compared with two historical controls of the previous RCT (namely RCT’s intervention and control group) [13] over 12 months; scale “financial functioning” was excluded from the analyzes because this scale was not part of the RCT; rates at 18 and 24 months are not analyzed because these were not assessed in the RCT; χ2 tests: 0 months p = .54, 3 months p = .32, 6 months p = .14, 9 months p = .66, 12 months p = .77

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wöckel A, Schwentner L, Krockenberger M, Kreienberg R, Janni W, Wischnewsky M, Thorsten K, Felix F, Riccardo F, Blettner M, Singer S. Predictors of the course of quality of life during therapy in women with primary breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(8):2201–2208. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1570-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Couwenberg AM, Burbach JPM, van Grevenstein WMU, Smits AB, Consten ECJ, Schiphorst AHW, Wijffels NAT, Heikens JT, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. Effect of neoadjuvant therapy and rectal surgery on health-related quality of life in patients with rectal cancer during the first 2 years after diagnosis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17(3):e499–e512. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Detmar SB, Aaronson NK, Wever LDV, Muller M, Schornagel JH. How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients’ and oncologists’ preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3295–3301. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3295. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braeken APBM, Kempen GIJM, Eekers D, van Gils FCJM, Houben RMA, Lechner L. The usefulness and feasibility of a screening instrument to identify psychosocial problems in patients receiving curative radiotherapy: a process evaluation. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:479. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-479. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q, Mendoza TR, Wright SL, Berry MD, Malveaux D, Shah PK, Gning I, Hofstetter WL, Putnam JB, Jr, Vaporciyan AA. Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:994–1000. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.8315. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

Grants and funding