Bidirectional learning opportunities: How GP-supervisors and trainees exchange knowledge
- PMID: 34176147
- PMCID: PMC9291942
- DOI: 10.1111/medu.14590
Bidirectional learning opportunities: How GP-supervisors and trainees exchange knowledge
Abstract
Introduction: Workplace-based learning conversations can be a good opportunity for supervisors and trainees to learn from each other. When both professionals discuss their specific knowledge openly with each other, learning conversations may be a useful educational tool, for instance for learning how to apply evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the workplace. We do, however, need a better understanding of how the exchange of knowledge provides opportunities for such bidirectional learning. The aim of this study was therefore to analyse how trainees and supervisors currently handle bidirectional learning opportunities by describing in detail how supervisors respond to knowledge expressed by trainees during a learning conversation.
Method: We video-recorded learning conversations between supervisors and trainees in general practice (GP). Within these learning conversations, EBM discussions on medical topics were selected and transcribed. We then identified, analysed using Conversation Analysis (CA) and categorised each expression of knowledge by the trainee and the supervisor's subsequent response.
Results: We found that when a trainee expresses knowledge during the learning conversation, supervisors either (a) refute the expressed knowledge, (b) immediately suggest an alternative or (c) pose (additional) questions. These responses have consequences for the learning opportunities of both trainee and supervisor: it is only when supervisors pose further questions that trainees are encouraged to elaborate on their knowledge, leading to a bidirectional learning opportunity.
Discussion: Improving EBM learning opportunities for both supervisors and trainees requires more than simply instructing trainees to express knowledge-based-for instance-on recent evidence more often. Inflexible institutional roles related to historical claims of supervisors' epistemic authority hamper bidirectional learning. Posing open questions during learning conversations enhances the flexibility of institutional roles while also creating bidirectional learning opportunities.
© 2021 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Relationships, continuity and time in health professions education.Med Educ. 2021 Dec;55(12):1344-1346. doi: 10.1111/medu.14674. Epub 2021 Oct 25. Med Educ. 2021. PMID: 34612531 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. Experience‐based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):84‐91. - PubMed
-
- Wiese A, Kilty C, Bennett D. Supervised workplace learning in postgraduate training: a realist synthesis. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):951‐969.
-
- Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Contin Educ. 2004;26(2):247‐273.
-
- Thomson K. When I say … informal conversations. Med Educ. 2020;54(4):287‐288. - PubMed
-
- Tilburt JC, Goold SD, Siddiqui N, Mangrulkar RS. How do doctors use information in real‐time? A qualitative study of internal medicine resident precepting. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13(5):772‐780. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources