The Natural History of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grades 1, 2, and 3: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 34176914
- DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000604
The Natural History of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grades 1, 2, and 3: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to obtain an updated overview of regression, persistence, and progression rates of conservatively managed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN 1)/CIN 2/CIN 3.
Methods: Data sources were MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane (January 1, 1973-April 14, 2020). Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. To estimate outcome rates, we pooled proportions of the individual study results using random-effects meta-analysis, resulting in point estimates and corresponding 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was quantified by the I2 and τ2 measures.
Results: Eighty-nine studies were included, 63 studies on CIN 1 (n = 6,080-8,767), 42 on CIN 2 (n = 2,909-3,830), and 7 on CIN 3 (n = 245-351). The overall regression, persistence, and progression to CIN 2 or worse and CIN 3 or worse rates for women with conservatively managed CIN 1 were 60% (95% CI = 55-65, I2 = 92%), 25% (95% CI = 20-30, I2 = 94%), 11% (95% CI = 8-13, I2 = 89%), and 2% (95% CI = 1-3, I2 = 82%), respectively. The overall regression, persistence, and progression rates for CIN 2 were 55% (95% CI = 50-60, I2 = 85%), 23% (95% CI = 19-28, I2 = 83%), and 19% (95% CI = 15-23, I2 = 88%), respectively. Finally, for CIN 3, these were 28% (95% CI = 17-41, I2 = 68%), 67% (95% CI = 36-91, I2 = 84%), and 2% (95% CI = 0-25, I2 = 95%), respectively. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 regression was significantly higher in women 30 years or younger and high-risk human papillomavirus-negative women (66%, 95% CI = 62-70, I2 = 76%; 94%, 95% CI = 84-99, I2 = 60%). Only 2/7,180 (0.03%) and 10/3,037 (0.3%) of the CIN 1 and CIN 2 cases progressed to cervical cancer.
Conclusions: Most CIN 1/CIN 2 will regress spontaneously in less than 24 months, with the highest rates in high-risk human papillomavirus-negative and young women, whereas progression to cancer is less than 0.5%. Conservative management should be considered, especially in fertile women and with expected high compliance. Given the heterogeneity in regression rates of high-grade histology, this should be classified as CIN 2 or CIN 3 to guide management.
Copyright © 2021, ASCCP.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Conservative management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in Denmark: a cohort study.BJOG. 2020 May;127(6):729-736. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16081. Epub 2020 Jan 22. BJOG. 2020. PMID: 31880054 Free PMC article.
-
Antiretroviral Therapy and Detection of High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN2+) at Post-CIN Management Follow-up Among Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):e540-e548. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa238. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32162657
-
[The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and the clinical significance of p16(INK4a) protein as a marker of progression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Mar;50(3):210-5. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 26268412 Chinese.
-
Longitudinal study of human papillomavirus persistence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3: critical role of duration of infection.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):315-24. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq001. Epub 2010 Feb 15. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010. PMID: 20157096 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of age on histologic outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during observational management: results from large cohort, systematic review, meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 23;8(1):6383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24882-2. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29686397 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Skin Lesions Caused by HPV-A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 13;12(9):2098. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12092098. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 39335611 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Autophagy Process in Cervical Carcinogenesis: Role of Non-Coding-RNAs, Molecular Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Targets.Cells. 2022 Apr 13;11(8):1323. doi: 10.3390/cells11081323. Cells. 2022. PMID: 35456001 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictors for regression and progression of actively surveilled cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2: A prospective cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):763-773. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15032. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025. PMID: 39930620 Free PMC article.
-
The treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (HSIL): between active surveillance and surgery-a 10-year monocentric data analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08097-1. Online ahead of print. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 40627062
-
Intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix during pregnancy: reaffirming the safety of conservative management.Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Jun 23;60:101792. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101792. eCollection 2025 Aug. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40678576 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:829–46.
-
- Tainio K, Athanasiou A, Tikkinen KAO, et al. Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2018;360:k499.
-
- McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:425–34.
-
- Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016;354:i3633.
-
- Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1993;12:186–92.