Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;59(3):424-430.
doi: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.03.05.

SCREENING FOR DIABETIC RETINOPATHY - A TWELVE-MONTH REVIEW

Affiliations

SCREENING FOR DIABETIC RETINOPATHY - A TWELVE-MONTH REVIEW

Tomaž Gračner. Acta Clin Croat. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

The purpose is to provide a twelve-month database review of screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR). A total of 1428 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients screened in 2017 were analyzed in a retrospective study. Retinal photographs were reviewed by an ophthalmologist for the presence and stage of DR, as well as for additional nondiabetic findings. The following grading categories of DR were used: without DR, mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR), moderate NPDR, severe non-proliferative NPDR, proliferative DR (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and ungradable finding. Severe NPDR, PDR and CSME were classified as vision-threatening DR. Out of 1428 DM patients, 27 were diagnosed with type 1 DM and 1401 with type 2 DM, 353 of them had newly diagnosed type 2 DM. Without DR category was recorded in 85.2% of all eyes screened, 2.8% were ungradable, and 12% showed varying stages of DR. Vision-threatening DR was found in 2.8% and additional nondiabetic findings in 5.2% of all screened eyes. In the group of newly diagnosed type 2 DM, 92.5% of screened eyes were without DR, 3.1% were ungradable and 4.3% showed varying stages of DR. In the group of newly diagnosed type 2 DM, vision-threatening DR was recorded in 0.1% and additional nondiabetic finding in 5.7% of the eyes screened. In conclusion, a small proportion of screened DM patients with detected DR had vision-threatening DR.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic retinopathy; Maculopathy; Proliferative retinopathy; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates fort the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53. 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103:137–49. 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antonetti DA, Klein R, Gardner TW. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1227–39. 10.1056/NEJMra1005073 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang X, Saadine JB, Chou CF, Cotch MF, Cheng YJ, Geiss LS, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005-2010. JAMA. 2010;304:649–56. 10.1001/jama.2010.1111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leasher JL, Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Naidoo N, et al. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by diabetic retinopathy: a meta-analysis from 1990 to 2010. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1643–9. 10.2337/dc15-2171 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources