Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;25(5):493-498.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23816.

Timing of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Mortality among Patients with Severe COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Kapil G Zirpe  1 , Anand M Tiwari  1 , Sushma K Gurav  1 , Abhijit M Deshmukh  1 , Prasad B Suryawanshi  2 , Prajkta P Wankhede  1 , Upendrakumar S Kapse  1 , Abhaya P Bhoyar  1 , Afroz Z Khan  1 , Ria V Malhotra  1 , Pranoti H Kusalkar  1 , Kaustubh J Chavan  3 , Seema A Naik  3 , Rahul B Bhalke  3 , Ninad N Bhosale  2 , Sonika V Makhija  1 , Venkata N Kuchimanchi  1 , Amol S Jadhav  1 , Kedar R Deshmukh  3 , Gaurav S Kulkarni  4
Affiliations

Timing of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Mortality among Patients with Severe COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Kapil G Zirpe et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 May.

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) (CARDS) pneumonitis presents a clinical challenge as regards to the timing of intubation and ambiguity of outcome. There is a lack of clear consensus on when to switch patients from trials of noninvasive therapies to invasive mechanical ventilation. We investigated the effect of the timing of intubation from the time of admission on the clinical outcome of CARDS.

Aim and objective: The aim and objective was to analyze the effect of timing of intubation early (within 48 hours of admission to critical care unit) versus delayed (after 48 hours of admission to critical care unit) on mortality in severe CARDS patients.

Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study performed in a 28-bedded COVID-19 intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Pune, India. All patients admitted between April 1, 2020, and October 15, 2020, with confirmed COVID-19 (RT-PCR positive) requiring mechanical ventilation were included in the study.

Results: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Among 2,230 patients that were admitted to the hospital, 525 required critical care (23.5%), invasive mechanical ventilation was needed in 162 patients and 147 (28%) of critical care admission were included in the study cohort after exclusion. Seventy-five patients (51%) were intubated within 48 hours of critical care admission (early group) and 72 (48.9%) were intubated after 48 hours of critical care admission (delayed group). With regards to the total of 147 included patients; male patients were 74.1% with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range, 51-68 years). Diabetes (44.9%) and hypertension (43.5%) were the most common comorbidities. Higher admission acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores and lower absolute lymphocyte count were observed in patients intubated within 48 hours. The early intubated group had a mortality of 60% whereas the same was observed as 77.7% in delayed intubation group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Current study concludes that early intubation is associated with improved survival rates in severe CARDS patients.

How to cite this article: Zirpe KG, Tiwari AM, Gurav SK, Deshmukh AM, Suryawanshi PB, Wankhede PP, et al. Timing of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Mortality among Patients with Severe COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(5):493-498.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; Intubation; Mechanical ventilation; Mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Flowchart
Flowchart
Flow diagram of study participants. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; NIV, noninvasive ventilation; HFNO, high flow nasal oxygen
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Contini C, Di Nuzzo M, Barp N, Bonazza A, De Giorgio R, Tognon M, et al. The novel zoonotic COVID-19 pandemic: an expected global health concern. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020;14(3):254–264. doi: 10.3855/jidc.12671. DOI: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun P, Qie S, Liu Z, Ren J, Li K, Xi J. Clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a single arm meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;92(6):612–617. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25735. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Windisch W, Weber-Carstens S, Kluge S, Rossaint R, Welte T, Karagiannidis C. Invasive and non-invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2020;117(31–32):528. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0528. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matta SK. Dilemmas in Covid-19 respiratory distress: early vs late intubation; high tidal volume and low PEEP vs traditional approach? J Intensive Crit Care. 2020;6(2):7. doi: 10.36648/2471-8505.6.2.7. DOI: - DOI
    1. Dhont S, Derom E, Van Braeckel E, Depuydt P, Lambrecht BN. The pathophysiology of ‘happy’ hypoxemia in COVID-19. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01462-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources