Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 10:15:682156.
doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.682156. eCollection 2021.

Predictors of Functional Outcome in a Cohort of Hispanic Patients Using Exoskeleton Rehabilitation for Cerebrovascular Accidents and Traumatic Brain Injury

Affiliations

Predictors of Functional Outcome in a Cohort of Hispanic Patients Using Exoskeleton Rehabilitation for Cerebrovascular Accidents and Traumatic Brain Injury

Lisa R Treviño et al. Front Neurorobot. .

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) are two of the leading causes of disability in the United States. Robotic exoskeletons (RE) have been approved for rehabilitation by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for use after a CVA, and recently received approval for use in patients with TBI. The aim of the study was to determine which factors predict the improvement in functional independence measure (FIM) score after using RE rehabilitation in a population of patients with CVA or TBI. We carried out a retrospective chart-review analysis of the use of the RE (Ekso® GT) in the rehabilitation of patients with TBI and CVA using data from a single, private rehabilitation hospital for patients admitted and discharged between 01/01/2017 and 04/30/2020. From the medical records, we collected presentation date, Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) on the date of injury, rehabilitation start date, age, diabetes status on presentation (Yes or No), injury category (TBI or CVA), and both admission and discharge FIM scores. Matching algorithms resulted in one TBI patient matched to three CVA patients resulting in a sample size of 36. The diabetic and non-diabetic populations showed significant differences between age and days from injury to the start of rehabilitation. A multivariate linear regression assessed predictors for discharge motor FIM and found admission motor FIM score and total RE steps to be statistically significant predictors. For each point scored higher on the admission motor FIM the discharge FIM was increased by 1.19 FIM points, and for each 1,000 steps taken in the RE, the discharge motor FIM increased by three points. The type of acquired brain injury (CVA or TBI) was not found to affect functional outcome. The presented results show that key clinic-biologic factors including diabetic status, together with start to rehabilitation play key roles in discharge FIM scores for patients using RE. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04465019.

Keywords: diabetes; gait; injury; minorities; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of the method used for comparing patients in the CVA and TBI groups with the final number of subjects included in each group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparisons of motor FIM values. (A) Patients in the CVA group had similar admission and change in motor FIM compared to patients in the TBI group. (B) Diabetic status alone, did not influence the admission or the change in motor FIM score. However, diabetic status interacts with the time to start rehabilitation influencing motor FIM (see Table 3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asselin P. K., Avedissian M., Knezevic S., Kornfeld S., Spungen A. M. (2016). Training persons with spinal cord injury to ambulate using a powered exoskeleton. J. Vis. Exp. 12:54071. 10.3791/54071 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berger A., Horst F., Müller S., Steinberg F., Doppelmayr M. (2019). Current state and future prospects of EEG and fNIRS in robot-assisted gait rehabilitation: a brief review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13:172. 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00172 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackwell D. L., Villarroel M. A. (2018). Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey. Natl. Cent. Heal. Stat.
    1. Bode R. K., Heinemann A. W. (2002). Course of functional improvement after stroke, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 100–106. 10.1053/apmr.2002.26073 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruni M. F., Melegari C., De Cola M. C., Bramanti A., Bramanti P., Calabr,ò R. S. (2018). What does best evidence tell us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Neurosci. Off. J. Neurosurg. Soc. Australas. 48, 11–17. 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.048 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data