Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 10:12:692076.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.692076. eCollection 2021.

Variation of Two S3b Residues in KV4.1-4.3 Channels Underlies Their Different Modulations by Spider Toxin κ-LhTx-1

Affiliations

Variation of Two S3b Residues in KV4.1-4.3 Channels Underlies Their Different Modulations by Spider Toxin κ-LhTx-1

Zhen Xiao et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

The naturally occurred peptide toxins from animal venoms are valuable pharmacological tools in exploring the structure-function relationships of ion channels. Herein we have identified the peptide toxin κ-LhTx-1 from the venom of spider Pandercetes sp (the Lichen huntsman spider) as a novel selective antagonist of the KV4 family potassium channels. κ-LhTx-1 is a gating-modifier toxin impeded KV4 channels' voltage sensor activation, and mutation analysis has confirmed its binding site on channels' S3b region. Interestingly, κ-LhTx-1 differently modulated the gating of KV4 channels, as revealed by toxin inhibiting KV4.2/4.3 with much more stronger voltage-dependence than that for KV4.1. We proposed that κ-LhTx-1 trapped the voltage sensor of KV4.1 in a much more stable resting state than that for KV4.2/4.3 and further explored the underlying mechanism. Swapping the non-conserved S3b segments between KV4.1(280FVPK283) and KV4.3(275VMTN278) fully reversed their voltage-dependence phenotypes in inhibition by κ-LhTx-1, and intensive mutation analysis has identified P282 in KV4.1, D281 in KV4.2 and N278 in KV4.3 being the key residues. Furthermore, the last two residues in this segment of each KV4 channel (P282/K283 in KV4.1, T280/D281 in KV4.2 and T277/N278 in KV4.3) likely worked synergistically as revealed by our combinatorial mutations analysis. The present study has clarified the molecular basis in KV4 channels for their different modulations by κ-LhTx-1, which have advanced our understanding on KV4 channels' structure features. Moreover, κ-LhTx-1 might be useful in developing anti-arrhythmic drugs given its high affinity, high selectivity and unique action mode in interacting with the KV4.2/4.3 channels.

Keywords: KV4 channels; anti-arrhythmic drugs; molecular basis; spider toxin; voltage-dependent inhibition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Purification and characterization of κ-LhTx-1. (A), RP-HPLC profile of Pandercetes sp (inset) venom, the red asterisk labeled peak contains κ-LhTx-1. (B), κ-LhTx-1 was purified to homogeneity by analytical RP-HPLC (red asterisk labeled peak). (C), MALDI-TOF MS analysis of purified κ-LhTx-1, the inset shows its single isotopic molecular weight. (D), cDNA and protein sequence of κ-LhTx-1. The signal peptide, propeptide and mature peptide was shown in black bold, green bold and red bold, respectively. N-terminal sequence of κ-LhTx-1 was determined by Edman degradation and highlighted in yellow. (E), Representative traces showing KV4.1 was concentration-dependently inhibited by κ-nLhTx-1 (n = 5). Currents were elicited by a 300 ms depolarization to +30 mV from −80 mV holding. Scale bars, 0.5 nA × 50 ms. (F), The concentration-response curves of κ-nLhTx-1 and κ-sLhTx-1 inhibiting KV4.1 at + 30 mV, the IC50 values were determined as 1.36 ± 0.38 μM and 0.87 ± 0.15 μM for κ-nLhTx-1 and κ-sLhTx-1, respectively (n = 5). (G), Sequence alignment of κ-LhTx-1 with several toxins in the database using MEGA8.0.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
κ-LhTx-1 inhibits KV4 channels with different voltage-dependence. (A), Representative traces showing the inhibition of KV4 channels by κ-LhTx-1 at different depolarizing voltages (Upper panel: test at Va voltage for KV4.1, KV4.2 and KV4.3, respectively; Lower panel: test at +30 mV; n = 5–6). Holding potential was set to -80 mV, the Va value for each KV4 subtype was as shown in (B). Scale bars, 0.5 nA × 50 ms (Upper panel), 2 nA × 50 ms (Lower panel). (B, C), The concentration-response curves of κ-LhTx-1 inhibiting KV4 channels at their Va depolarization voltages (B) or +30 mV (C). The IC50 values in KV4.1, KV4.2 and KV4.3 were determined as 0.51 ± 0.11 μM and 0.87 ± 0.15 μM, 0.03 ± 0.01 μM and 0.14 ± 0.05 μM, 0.06 ± 0.02 μM and 0.16 ± 0.04 μM, at Va voltage and +30 mV, respectively (n = 5–6). (D), The I-V relationships of KV4.1, KV4.2 and KV4.3 channels before (black) and after (red) 10 μM κ-LhTx-1 treatment, currents at all voltages were normalized to the control current (before toxin treatment) at +100 mV in each group (n = 5–8). (E), The steady-state activation/inactivation curves of KV4.1, KV4.2 and KV4.3 channels before (black) and after (red) 10 μM κ-LhTx-1 treatment (n = 5–10). (F), The inhibition ratio of 10 µM κ-LhTx-1 on the currents mediated by KV4.1 (black), KV4.2 (blue) and KV4.3 (red) at different depolarizing voltages (n = 5–8). a, p < 0.05 when comparing the ratio in KV4.2 with that in KV4.1; b, p < 0.05 when comparing the ratio in KV4.3 with that in KV4.1(ONE-WAY ANOVA). (G), Representative traces showing κ-LhTx-1 inhibited the gating currents of KV4.1–4.3 channels. Cells were held at -100 mV, currents were elicited by a 20 ms depolarization to +30 mV, note the ON gating current (Ig ON) was larger than the OFF gating current (Ig OFF) due to gating charge immobilization; Scale bar: 100 pA × 5 ms; n = 5–6. (H), Statistics of inhibition of gating charge (Q; integral of Ig ON) movement by application of 500 nM and 10 µM κ-LhTx-1, note 500 nM and 10 µM toxin inhibited essentially the same proportion of gating charge movement in KV4.2/4.3 channels but not in KV4.1 (n = 5–6).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Characterizing the non-conserved S3b segments in KV4.1 and KV4.3 as the key molecular determinants. (A), Left: sequence alignment of the KV4 channels’ S3b-S4 segments, the non-conserved S3b regions are underlined, and the number below the residue indicates its location in the sequence (in mKV4.1, rKV4.2 and rKV4.3 numbering); Right: Locations of the non-conserved S3b segments in the simulated structures of KV4.1–4.3 channels as determined by SWISS-MODEL using 5WIE (PDB ID) as the template (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/), note only one subunit for each channel was shown for clarity. (B), The concentration-response curves of κ-LhTx-1 inhibiting the KV4.1/279LF/AA, KV4.2/277LV/AA and KV4.3/274LV/AA mutants at their respective Va depolarizing voltages (n = 5–7). For comparison, the curves for wild-type KV4.1, KV4.2 and KV4.3 were shown in dashed lines. KV4.1/279LF/AA, KV4.2/277LV/AA and KV4.3/274LV/AA were made by mutating L279/F280 in KV4.1, L277/V278 in KV4.2 and L274/V275 in KV4.3, to alanines, respectively. (C) and (D), The I-V curve of KV4.1/280VMTN (C) and KV4.3/275FVPK (D) before (black) and after (red) 10 μM κ-LhTx-1 treatment, currents at all voltages were normalized to the control current (before toxin treatment) at +100 mV in each group (n = 5). KV4.1/280VMTN and KV4.3/275FVPK chimeras were made by replacing the 280FVPK283 segment in KV4.1 with VMTN and the 275VMTN278 segment in KV4.3 with FVPK, respectively. (E), The statistical diagram of the ∆Va and inhi%(min) values for wild-type KV4.1, KV4.3, KV4.1/280VMTN and KV4.3/275FVPK, showing swapping the non-conserved S3b segments between KV4.1 and KV4.3 exchanged their voltage-dependence phenotypes in inhibition by κ-LhTx-1 (***, p < 0.001; NS, not significantly different; ONE-WAY ANOVA; n = 5–13).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Characterizing the key residues in the non-conserved S3b segment. (A), Representative traces of κ-LhTx-1 inhibiting KV4.1/F280V, KV4.1/V281M, KV4.1/P282T and Kv4.1/K283D mutants (n = 5). (B–D), The I-V curves of KV4.1/P282T (B), KV4.2/T280P (C) and KV4.3/T277P (D) mutants before (black) and after (red) 10 μM κ-LhTx-1 treatment (n = 5–6). Currents at all voltages were normalized to the control current (before toxin treatment) at +100 mV in each group. (E), The concentration-response curves of κ-LhTx-1 inhibiting KV4.1/F280V, KV4.1/V281M, KV4.1/P282T and KV4.1/K283D mutants at +30 mV (n = 5). The curve for KV4.1 was also included for comparison. (F–H), The I-V curves of KV4.1/K283D (F), KV4.2/D281K (G) and KV4.3/N278K (H) mutants before (black) and after (red) 10 μM κ-LhTx-1 treatment (n = 5–6). Currents at all voltages were normalized to the control current (before toxin treatment) at +100 mV in each group. (I) and (J), The statistical diagram of the ∆Va and inhi%(min) values of wild-type KV4 channels and mutants referred in this Figure, showing that P282T mutation in KV4.1, D281K mutation in KV4.2, as well as N278K mutation in KV4.3 dramatically changed channel’s voltage-dependence phenotype in inhibition by κ-LhTx-1 (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, not significantly different; ONE-WAY ANOVA; n = 5–8).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The synergistic action of involved key residues. (A–C), The I-V curves of KV4.1/282TD (A), KV4.2/280PK (B) and KV4.3/277PK (C) before and after 10 μM κ-LhTx-1 treatment (n = 5–6). Currents at all voltages were normalized to the control current (before toxin treatment) at +100 mV in each group. KV4.1/282TD, KV4.2/280PK and KV4.3/277PK mutants were made by mutating P282/K283 to T282/D283 in KV4.1, T280/D281 to P280/K281 in KV4.2 and T277/N278 to P277/K278 in KV4.3, respectively. (D), The statistical diagram of the ∆Va and inhi%(min) values of wild-type KV4 channels and mutants referred in this Figure, showing KV4.1/282TD has the same voltage-dependence phenotype as KV4.2/4.3, while KV4.2/280PK and KV4.3/277PK have the same voltage-dependence phenotype as KV4.1, as regard to their inhibition by κ-LhTx-1 (***, p < 0.001; NS, not significantly different; ONE-WAY ANOVA).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. An W. F., Bowlby M. R., Betty M., Cao J., Ling H.-P., Mendoza G., et al. (2000). Modulation of A-type Potassium Channels by a Family of Calcium Sensors. Nature 403, 553–556. 10.1038/35000592 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antzelevitch C., Yan G. X., Ackerman M. J., Borggrefe M., Corrado D., Guo J., et al. (2017). J-Wave Syndromes Expert Consensus Conference Report: Emerging Concepts and Gaps in Knowledge. Europace 19, 665–694. 10.1093/europace/euw235 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antzelevitch C., Patocskai B. (2016). Brugada Syndrome: Clinical, Genetic, Molecular, Cellular, and Ionic Aspects. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 41, 7–57. 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2015.06.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldwin T. J., Tsaur M.-L., Lopez G. A., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. (1991). Characterization of a Mammalian cDNA for an Inactivating Voltage-Sensitive K+ Channel. Neuron 7, 471–483. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90299-f - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barghaan J., Bähring R. (2009). Dynamic Coupling of Voltage Sensor and Gate Involved in Closed-State Inactivation of kv4.2 Channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 133, 205–224. 10.1085/jgp.200810073 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources