Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 10:12:683316.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.683316. eCollection 2021.

Nasal High Flow at 25 L/min or Expiratory Resistive Load Do Not Improve Regional Lung Function in Patients With COPD: A Functional CT Imaging Study

Affiliations

Nasal High Flow at 25 L/min or Expiratory Resistive Load Do Not Improve Regional Lung Function in Patients With COPD: A Functional CT Imaging Study

Julien G Cohen et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Background: Nasal high flow (NHF) is a non-invasive breathing therapy that is based on the delivery via a large-caliber nasal cannula of heated and humidified air at flow rates that exceed peak inspiratory flow. It is thought that positive airway pressure generated by NHF can help reduce gas trapping and improve regional lung ventilation. There are no data to confirm this hypothesis at flow rates applicable in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

Methods: In this study, we used non-rigid registration of computed tomography (CT) images acquired at maximal expiration and inspiration to compute regional lung attenuation changes (ΔHU), and lung displacement (LD), indices of regional lung ventilation. Parametric response maps (Galban et al., 2012) were also computed in each experimental condition. Eight COPD patients were assessed at baseline (BL) and after 5 min of NHF and expiratory resistive loading (ERL).

Results: ΔHU was: BL (median, IQR): 85 (67.2, 102.8); NHF: 90.7 (57.4, 97.6); ERL: 74.6 (46.4, 89.6) HU (p = 0.531); and LD: 27.8 (22.3, 39.3); 17.6 (15.4, 27.9); and 20.4 (16.6, 23.6) mm (p = 0.120) in the 3 conditions, respectively. No significant difference in trapping was observed. Respiratory rate significantly decreased with both treatments [BL: 17.3 (16.4, 18.9); NHF: 13.7; ERL: 11.4 (9.6, 13.2) bpm; and p < 0.001].

Conclusion: Neither NHF at 25 L/min nor ERL significantly improved the regional lung ventilation of stable COPD patients with gas trapping, based on functional lung CT imaging. Further study including more subjects is needed to assess the potential effect of NHF on regional lung function at higher flow rates.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov/under, identifier NCT03821311.

Keywords: COPD; computed tomography; expiratory resistive loading; image processing; nasal high flow cannula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J-LP has received grants and research funds for other studies from: Air Liquide Foundation, Agiradom, AstraZeneca, Fisher & Paykel, Mutualia, Philips, Resmed, Vitalaire, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Night Balance, and Sefam. SB received funding from Fisher & Paykel for this study. The funder was involved in the study design, but not the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Image processing workflow. Inspiratory and expiratory CT images were segmented using a region growing algorithm. The segmented expiratory image is warped using elastic image registration software to match the inspiratory image. The indices of regional lung ventilation are computed based on the registered and inspiratory images.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
3D rendering of computed regional lung function indices in a sample COPD patient. PRM, parametric response maps; ΔHU, regional attenuation changes from maximal expiration to maximal inspiration; LD, lung displacement; NHF, nasal high flow; and ERL, expiratory resistive loading.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Respiratory rate in each of 8 COPD patients; BL, baseline; NHF, nasal high flow cannula; and ERL, expiratory resistive loading. *p < 0.05 vs. BL, #p < 0.05 vs. NHF.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adams R., Bischof L. (1994). Seeded region growing. IEEE Transact. 16 641–647.
    1. Ashraf-Kashani N., Kumar R. (2017). High-flow nasal oxygen therapy. BJA Educat. 17 63–67.
    1. Chae K. J., Choi J., Jin G. Y., Hoffman E. A., Laroia A. T., Park M., et al. (2020). Relative Regional Air Volume Change Maps at the Acinar Scale Reflect Variable Ventilation in Low Lung Attenuation of COPD patients. Acad. Radiol. 27 1540–1548. 10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chanques G., Riboulet F., Molinari N., Carr J., Jung B., Prades A., et al. (2013). Comparison of three high flow oxygen therapy delivery devices: a clinical physiological cross-over study. Min. Anestesiol. 79 1344–1355. - PubMed
    1. Corley A., Caruana L. R., Barnett A. G., Tronstad O., Fraser J. F. (2011). Oxygen delivery through high-flow nasal cannulae increase end-expiratory lung volume and reduce respiratory rate in post-cardiac surgical patients. Br. J. Anaesth. 107 998–1004. 10.1093/bja/aer265 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data