Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;16(7):074009.
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abfcf9. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

Ensuring that offsets and other internationally transferred mitigation outcomes contribute effectively to limiting global warming

Affiliations

Ensuring that offsets and other internationally transferred mitigation outcomes contribute effectively to limiting global warming

Myles Allen et al. Environ Res Lett. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Ensuring the environmental integrity of internationally transferred mitigation outcomes, whether through offset arrangements, a market mechanism or non-market approaches, is a priority for the implementation of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Any conventional transferred mitigation outcome, such as an offset agreement, that involves exchanging greenhouse gases with different lifetimes can increase global warming on some timescales. We show that a simple 'do no harm' principle regarding the choice of metrics to use in such transactions can be used to guard against this, noting that it may also be applicable in other contexts such as voluntary and compliance carbon markets. We also show that both approximate and exact 'warming equivalent' exchanges are possible, but present challenges of implementation in any conventional market. Warming-equivalent emissions may, however, be useful in formulating warming budgets in a two-basket approach to mitigation and in reporting contributions to warming in the context of the global stocktake.

Keywords: Paris Agreement; greenhouse gas metrics; internationally transferred mitigation outcomes; offsets; voluntary carbon markets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Impact on global mean surface temperature of transfers involving ‘offsetting’ the emission of methane with avoided emission or removal of CO2. Left panel shows the impact of a one-off transfer occurring in year 0, while the right panel shows the impact of a sustained transfer offsetting a constant rate of emission of methane with a constant rate of avoided emission or removal of CO2, starting in year 0. Green, purple and yellow lines show impact on global temperature when the amount of CO2 is calculated using GWP20, GWP100, & GTP100, respectively, blue lines using warming-equivalent emissions calculated using GWP* and red lines using linear warming-equivalent emissions. Grey lines show warming caused by methane emissions without any CO2 offsetting. Based on the ‘do no harm’ principle proposed here, GWP20 would be the recommended conventional metric for this class of transaction. All calculations performed using the standard AR5 impulse response model with thermal response parameters scaled to give an equilibrium climate sensitivity of 2.75 °C (original model was 3.9 °C) [6].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
As figure 1, but for transfers involving offsetting emission of CO2 with avoided emission of methane. GTP100 would be the recommended conventional metric for this class of transaction under a ‘do no harm’ principle.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Warming-equivalent emissions of CO2 giving the same forcing response to (a) a pulse emission of methane in year 0 and (b) a sustained constant emission of methane starting in year 0, calculated using the GWP* approximation in blue and exact linear warming equivalent (LWE) emissions (multiplying the forcing response to methane emissions by the inverse of the CO2 absolute global forcing potential (AGFP) matrix—see section 6) in red.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Warming-equivalent emissions of methane giving the same forcing response to (a) a pulse emission of CO2 in year 0 and (b) a sustained constant emission of CO2 starting in year 0, calculated using the GWP* approximation in blue and exact LWE emissions in red.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(a) Annual emissions of CO2 (grey) and methane (other colours) under various metrics for a representative 1.5 °C-consistent scenario. Thin lines show metric-equivalent methane emissions using GWP100 (purple), GWP20 (green) and GTP100 (yellow). Thick red line shows exact LWE emissions obtained by inverting the AR5 linear response model, while thin blue line shows the GWP* approximation. (b) CO2-induced (grey dotted), methane-induced (red dotted) and combined (black dotted) warming calculated with the AR5 linear impulse-response model compared with cumulative emissions under the various metrics. Cumulative totals from both gases are shown aggregated using GWP100 (dashed black), LWE (thick black), GWP* (thin black), GWP20 and GTP100 (upper and lower dash-dot black).

References

    1. Available at: https://andina.pe/ingles/noticia-peru-switzerland-sign-agreement-to-redu....
    1. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/SBSTA51.DTi10d.pdf.
    1. See for example the submission to the UNFCCC on article 6 by the association of small island states (AOSIS) available at: www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionsStaging/Documents/167_z1315425080496758....
    1. Schneider L, Theuer S L H. Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement. Clim. Policy. 2019;19:386–400. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1521332. - DOI
    1. La Hoz Theuer S, Schneider L, Broekhoff D. When less is more: limits to international transfers under article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Clim. Policy. 2019;19:401–13. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1540341. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources