Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 24;13(5):e15216.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.15216.

Fetomaternal Outcome Among the Pregnant Women Subject to the Induction of Labor

Affiliations

Fetomaternal Outcome Among the Pregnant Women Subject to the Induction of Labor

Sarah Kazi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Induction of labor (IOL) is characterized by stimulating contractions of the uterus just before the instantaneous onset of labor, with or without amniotomy. According to the recommendation of the World Health Organization (WHO), induction must only be carried out when there is a clear medical need for one and when potential benefits outweigh the expected harm that may be caused by it. The present study was to determine the frequency of fetomaternal outcomes among pregnant women subject to the induction of labor. Methods The present prospective cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of one year starting from June 17, 2018, to July 25, 2019, in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit III, Civil Hospital Karachi. After institutional ethical committee approval, 302 pregnant women who were subject to induction of labor were enrolled using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Outcome variables, i.e., postpartum hemorrhage, mode of delivery, hospital stay more than seven days, birth asphyxia, Apgar score < 7 at five minutes, neonatal jaundice, and low birth weight were noted. IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for data analysis. Results A total of 302 women with an average age range was 18-45 years with a mean age of 28.5 ± 4.47, body mass index (BMI) 29.83 ± 3.83, and mean gestational age was 37 ± 4.3. Almost 205 (67.9%) of the cases were booked. One hundred and eighty (59.6%) were nulliparas, 57(18.8%) had para-1, 43 (14.4%) had para-2, and 22 (7.14%) had par-3. When fetomaternal outcome among the pregnant women subject to induction of labor was observed, postpartum hemorrhage was observed in 55 (18.21%), hospital stay more than seven days was in 51 (17%), birth asphyxia was in 45 (14.9%), neonatal jaundice was in 53 (17.6%), low birth weight was in 15 (4.96%), Apgar score < 7 was in 48 (16%), 39 (13%) women underwent for C-section and 263 (87%) of the women delivered vaginally. Conclusion This study concludes that the induction of labor (IOL) is safe and reliable and less risk of adverse feto-maternal outcome is associated with pregnancies between 37 weeks and 42 weeks of gestation. The evidence regarding IOL prior to 37 weeks and beyond 42 weeks of gestation is inadequate to reach any conclusion.

Keywords: feto-maternal outcome; induction of labour; mode of delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patterns and outcomes of induction of labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health. Vogel JP, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM. PloS One. 2013;8:65612. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_h... 2011
    1. To study the fetomaternal outcome and progress of labour among induced versus spontaneous labour in nulliparous women (using modified WHO partograph) Suchika G, Usha S, Premlata M, Madhu M. http://saspublisher.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SJAMS-25A1577-1580.pdf Sch J App Med Sci. 2014;2:1577–1580.
    1. Factors and outcomes associated with the induction of labour in Latin America. Guerra G, Cecatti J, Souza J, et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;116:1762–1772. - PubMed
    1. A systematic review of implementing an elective labor induction policy. Akinsipe DC, Villalobos LE, Ridley RT. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41:5–16. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources