Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1043-1053.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2488.

Comparative Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors vs Sulfonylureas in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Affiliations

Comparative Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors vs Sulfonylureas in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Yan Xie et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Importance: In the treatment of type 2 diabetes, evidence of the comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors vs sulfonylureas-the second most widely used antihyperglycemic class after metformin-is lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors and sulfonylureas associated with the risk of all-cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes using metformin.

Design, setting, and participants: A cohort study used data from the US Department of Veterans Affairs compared the use of SGLT2 inhibitors vs sulfonylureas in individuals receiving metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes. A total of 23 870 individuals with new use of SGLT2 inhibitors and 104 423 individuals with new use of sulfonylureas were enrolled between October 1, 2016, and February 29, 2020, and followed up until January 31, 2021.

Exposures: New use of SGLT2 inhibitors or sulfonylureas.

Main outcomes and measures: This study examined the outcome of all-cause mortality. Predefined variables and covariates identified by a high-dimensional variable selection algorithm were used to build propensity scores. The overlap weighting method based on the propensity scores was used to estimate the intention-to-treat effect sizes of SGLT2 inhibitor compared with sulfonylurea therapy. The inverse probability of the treatment adherence weighting method was used to estimate the per-protocol effect sizes.

Results: Among the 128 293 participants (mean [SD] age, 64.60 [9.84] years; 122 096 [95.17%] men), 23 870 received an SGLT2 inhibitor and 104 423 received a sulfonylurea. Compared with sulfonylureas, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87), yielding an event rate difference of -5.15 (95% CI, -7.16 to -3.02) deaths per 1000 person-years. Compared with sulfonylureas, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a reduced risk of death, regardless of cardiovascular disease status, in several categories of estimated glomerular filtration rate (including rates from >90 to ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and in participants with no albuminuria (albumin to creatinine ratio [ACR] ≤30 mg/g), microalbuminuria (ACR >30 to ≤300 mg/g), and macroalbuminuria (ACR >300 mg/g). In per-protocol analyses, continued use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a reduced risk of death compared with continued use of sulfonylureas (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74; event rate difference, -10.10; 95% CI, -12.97 to -7.24 deaths per 1000 person-years). In additional per-protocol analyses, continued use of SGLT2 inhibitors with metformin was associated with a reduced risk of death compared with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment without metformin (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.97; event rate difference, -7.62; 95% CI, -17.12 to -0.48 deaths per 1000 person-years).

Conclusions and relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study analyzing data from the US Department of Veterans Affairs, among patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin therapy, SGLT2 inhibitor treatment was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality compared with sulfonylureas. The results provide data from a real-world setting that might help guide the choice of antihyperglycemic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr McGill reported receiving grants from Dexcom, Medtronic, and Novo Nordisk, and personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Metavant, and Salix outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Adjusted Intention-to-Treat Survival Probability for All-Cause Mortality
Survival probability in the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor and sulfonylurea treatment arms. Shaded bands represent 95% CIs.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Intention-to-Treat Hazard Ratios (HRs) and Event Rate Reduction for All-Cause Mortality in the Overall Cohort and Prespecified Subgroups
Hazard ratios of all-cause mortality in the overall cohort and by age category, cardiovascular disease (CVD) status, estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) category, albuminuria category, body mass index (BMI) category (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), and baseline use of metformin, insulin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACE inhibitor/ARB), and diuretics. SGLT2 indicates sodium-glucose cotransporter-2. aAlbuminuria status was categorized using albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR): no albuminuria (ACR ≤30 mg/g), microalbuminuria (ACR >30 to ≤300 mg/g), and macroalbuminuria (ACR >300 mg/g).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Per-Protocol Hazard Ratios (HRs) and Event Rate Reduction for All-Cause Mortality
Hazard ratios of all-cause mortality in continued use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors or sulfonylureas (reference group) throughout follow-up (top graph) and continued use of SGLT2 inhibitors with metformin or SGLT2 inhibitors without metformin (reference group) throughout follow up (bottom graph).

Comment in

References

    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. ; CANVAS Program Collaborative Group . Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644-657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. ; DECLARE–TIMI 58 Investigators . Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347-357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators . Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117-2128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, et al. ; CREDENCE Trial Investigators . Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295-2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mosenzon O, Wiviott SD, Cahn A, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on development and progression of kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(8):606-617. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30180-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms