Impact of abortion law reforms on women's health services and outcomes: a systematic review protocol
- PMID: 34183064
- PMCID: PMC8240208
- DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01739-w
Impact of abortion law reforms on women's health services and outcomes: a systematic review protocol
Abstract
Background: A country's abortion law is a key component in determining the enabling environment for safe abortion. While restrictive abortion laws still prevail in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), many countries have reformed their abortion laws, with the majority of them moving away from an absolute ban. However, the implications of these reforms on women's access to and use of health services, as well as their health outcomes, is uncertain. First, there are methodological challenges to the evaluation of abortion laws, since these changes are not exogenous. Second, extant evaluations may be limited in terms of their generalizability, given variation in reforms across the abortion legality spectrum and differences in levels of implementation and enforcement cross-nationally. This systematic review aims to address this gap. Our aim is to systematically collect, evaluate, and synthesize empirical research evidence concerning the impact of abortion law reforms on women's health services and outcomes in LMICs.
Methods: We will conduct a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature on changes in abortion laws and women's health services and outcomes in LMICs. We will search Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, as well as grey literature and reference lists of included studies for further relevant literature. As our goal is to draw inference on the impact of abortion law reforms, we will include quasi-experimental studies examining the impact of change in abortion laws on at least one of our outcomes of interest. We will assess the methodological quality of studies using the quasi-experimental study designs series checklist. Due to anticipated heterogeneity in policy changes, outcomes, and study designs, we will synthesize results through a narrative description.
Discussion: This review will systematically appraise and synthesize the research evidence on the impact of abortion law reforms on women's health services and outcomes in LMICs. We will examine the effect of legislative reforms and investigate the conditions that might contribute to heterogeneous effects, including whether specific groups of women are differentially affected by abortion law reforms. We will discuss gaps and future directions for research. Findings from this review could provide evidence on emerging strategies to influence policy reforms, implement abortion services and scale up accessibility.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019126927.
Keywords: Abortion law/policies; Impact; Contraception; Fertility; Unsafe abortion.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Impact of abortion law reforms on health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1483-1498. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab069. Health Policy Plan. 2021. PMID: 34133729
-
Women's experiences and outcomes of abortion care in sub-Saharan countries: A mixed methods systematic review protocol.PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0318488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318488. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39888867 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Why do they take the risk? A systematic review of the qualitative literature on informal sector abortions in settings where abortion is legal.BMC Womens Health. 2019 Apr 8;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0751-0. BMC Womens Health. 2019. PMID: 30961574 Free PMC article.
-
Agenda setting and socially contentious policies: Ethiopia's 2005 reform of its law on abortion.Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(Suppl 1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01255-z. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 35698196 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme Court Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling: A machine learning approach.Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 May 4;4:1149441. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1149441. eCollection 2023. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37214560 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate and delayed placement of the intrauterine device after abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 May 18;14(1):11385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62327-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38762680 Free PMC article.
-
The sanctity of life: The role of purity in attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia.Int J Psychol. 2023 Feb;58(1):16-29. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12877. Epub 2022 Sep 13. Int J Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36097848 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Guttmacher Institute. Induced Abortion Worldwide; Global Incidence and Trends 2018. https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-worldwide. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
-
- Singh S, Remez L, Sedgh G, Kwok L, Onda T. Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress and unequal access. NewYork: Guttmacher Institute; 2018.
-
- Fusco CLB. Unsafe abortion: a serious public health issue in a poverty stricken population. Reprod Clim. 2013;2(8):2–9.
-
- Rehnstrom Loi U, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Faxelid E, Klingberg-Allvin M. Health care providers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards induced abortions in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: a systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative data. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1502-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous