Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Apr 15;59(4):320-330.
doi: 10.1007/s13312-022-2500-y. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners

Joseph L Mathew. Indian Pediatr. .

Abstract

Systematic reviews involve the application of scientific methods to reduce bias in review of literature. The key components of a systematic review are a well-defined research question, comprehensive literature search to identify all studies that potentially address the question, systematic assembly of the studies that answer the question, critical appraisal of the methodological quality of the included studies, data extraction and analysis (with and without statistics), and considerations towards applicability of the evidence generated in a systematic review. These key features can be remembered as six 'A'; Ask, Access, Assimilate, Appraise, Analyze and Apply. Meta-analysis is a statistical tool that provides pooled estimates of effect from the data extracted from individual studies in the systematic review. The graphical output of meta-analysis is a forest plot which provides information on individual studies and the pooled effect. Systematic reviews of literature can be undertaken for all types of questions, and all types of study designs. This article highlights the key features of systematic reviews, and is designed to help readers understand and interpret them. It can also help to serve as a beginner's guide for both users and producers of systematic reviews and to appreciate some of the methodological issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sackett D, Strauss S, Richardson W, et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone: 2000.
    1. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376–80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. PennState Eberley College of Science. Lesson 4: Bias and Random Error. Accessed October 01, 2020. Available from: https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat509/node/26/
    1. Comprehensive Meta-analysis. Accessed October 01, 2020. Available from: https://www.meta-analysis.com/pages/why_do.php?cart=
    1. National Institute for Health Research. PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. Accessed October 01, 2020. Available from: https://utas.libguides.com/SystematicReviews/Protocol

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources