Developing and Deploying an Automated Quality Reporting System in Your Practice: Learning From the Stanford Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Program

Affiliations

¹ Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
² Critical Care Quality and Strategic Initiatives, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.

Uri Ladabaum et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021.

. 2021 Jul 1;116(7):1365-1370.

doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001265.

¹ Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
² Critical Care Quality and Strategic Initiatives, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.

No abstract available

References

1. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2016;315:2564–75.
1. Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2017;153:307–23.
1. Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC, et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: A consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2020;91:463–85.
1. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:31–53.
1. Robertson DJ, Kaminski MF, Bretthauer M. Effectiveness, training and quality assurance of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Gut 2015;64:982–90.