Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13392.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92458-8.

Automated segmentation of macular edema for the diagnosis of ocular disease using deep learning method

Affiliations

Automated segmentation of macular edema for the diagnosis of ocular disease using deep learning method

Zhenhua Wang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Macular edema is considered as a major cause of visual loss and blindness in patients with ocular fundus diseases. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive imaging technique, which has been widely applied for diagnosing macular edema due to its non-invasive and high resolution properties. However, the practical applications remain challenges due to the distorted retinal morphology and blurred boundaries near macular edema. Herein, we developed a novel deep learning model for the segmentation of macular edema in OCT images based on DeepLab framework (OCT-DeepLab). In this model, we used atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) to detect macular edema at multiple features and used the fully connected conditional random field (CRF) to refine the boundary of macular edema. OCT-DeepLab model was compared against the traditional hand-crafted methods (C-V and SBG) and the end-to-end methods (FCN, PSPnet, and U-net) to estimate the segmentation performance. OCT-DeepLab showed great advantage over the hand-crafted methods (C-V and SBG) and end-to-end methods (FCN, PSPnet, and U-net) as shown by higher precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. The segmentation performance of OCT-DeepLab was comparable to that of manual label, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.963, which was superior to other end-to-end methods (FCN, PSPnet, and U-net). Collectively, OCT-DeepLab model is suitable for the segmentation of macular edema and assist ophthalmologists in the management of ocular disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of OCT-DeepLab method.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of 2-level wavelet transform. (A) First level wavelet transform. (B) Second level wavelet transform.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Decomposing process of OCT image by 2-level wavelet transform.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Denoising flowchart of OCT image. (A) Original OCT image. (B) Low-frequency band of OCT image. (C) Low-frequency band of OCT image by reducing speckle noises. (D) Reconstitution of OCT image.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Principle for coarse segmentation of macular edema in OCT image. (A) Operating principle of residual learning block. (B) The workflow of conventional convolution and atrous convolution. Conventional convolution operation with 3 × 3 kernel size and 1 stride. Atrous convolution operation with 3 × 3 kernel size, 1 stride, and 2 rate. (C) Coarse segmentation of macular edema in OCT image.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Refine the segmentation results of macular edema by FC-CRF. (A) Sensitivity test for FC-CRF model. (B) Refined segmentation result of macular edema in OCT images.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Different segmentation results of macular edema by Deeplab with different setting.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Segmentation results of macular edema by different methods. Red line is the initial contour curve of segmentation; Green line is the segmentation result of macular edema.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Segmentation results of macular edema by different methods.
Figure 10
Figure 10
ROC curves from the segmentation of macular edema by different methods.

References

    1. Daruich A, et al. Mechanisms of macular edema: beyond the surface. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2018;63:20–68. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.10.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tomkins-Netzer O, Ismetova F, Bar A, Seguin-Greenstein S, Kramer M, Lightman S. Functional outcome of macular edema in different retinal disorders. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2015;48:119–136. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.05.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan GS, Cheung N, Simó R, Cheung GC, Wong TY. Diabetic macular oedema. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:143–155. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30052-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Das R, Spence G, Hogg RE, Stevenson M, Chakravarthy U. Disorganization of inner retina and outer retinal morphology in diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136:202–208. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6256. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monroy GL, Won J, Spillman DR, Jr, Dsouza R, Boppart SA. Clinical translation of handheld optical coherence tomography: practical considerations and recent advancements. J. Biomed. Opt. 2017;22:1–30. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types