Prospective evaluation of interrater agreement between EEG technologists and neurophysiologists
- PMID: 34183718
- PMCID: PMC8238944
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92827-3
Prospective evaluation of interrater agreement between EEG technologists and neurophysiologists
Abstract
We aim to prospectively investigate, in a large and heterogeneous population, the electroencephalogram (EEG)-reading performances of EEG technologists. A total of 8 EEG technologists and 5 certified neurophysiologists independently analyzed 20-min EEG recordings. Interrater agreement (IRA) for predefined EEG pattern identification between EEG technologists and neurophysiologits was assessed using percentage of agreement (PA) and Gwet-AC1. Among 1528 EEG recordings, the PA [95% confidence interval] and interrater agreement (IRA, AC1) values were as follows: status epilepticus (SE) and seizures, 97% [96-98%], AC1 kappa = 0.97; interictal epileptiform discharges, 78% [76-80%], AC1 = 0.63; and conclusion dichotomized as "normal" versus "pathological", 83.6% [82-86%], AC1 = 0.71. EEG technologists identified SE and seizures with 99% [98-99%] negative predictive value, whereas the positive predictive values (PPVs) were 48% [34-62%] and 35% [20-53%], respectively. The PPV for normal EEGs was 72% [68-76%]. SE and seizure detection were impaired in poorly cooperating patients (SE and seizures; p < 0.001), intubated and older patients (SE; p < 0.001), and confirmed epilepsy patients (seizures; p = 0.004). EEG technologists identified ictal features with few false negatives but high false positives, and identified normal EEGs with good PPV. The absence of ictal features reported by EEG technologists can be reassuring; however, EEG traces should be reviewed by neurophysiologists before taking action.
Conflict of interest statement
IB: reports a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation. SA: reports no conflict of interest. PSR: reports personal fees from Eisai. NS: reports no conflict of interest. FR: reports personal fees from Arvelle Therapeutics, Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Medtronic, and UCB, and grants from the Detlev-Wrobel-Fonds for Epilepsy Research, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the LOEWE Program of the State of Hesse, and the European Union. AS: reports personal fees and grants from Arvelle Therapeutics, Desitin Arzneimittel, Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals companies, LivaNova, Marinus Pharma, Medtronic, UCB, and Zogenix.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Electroencephalography Technologist Inter-rater Agreement and Interpretation of Pediatric Critical Care Electroencephalography.Pediatr Neurol. 2021 Feb;115:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Nov 10. Pediatr Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33333462 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Electrographic Seizure Detection by Neurophysiologists and Non-Neurophysiologists in the Adult ICU Using a Panel of Quantitative EEG Trends.J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Aug;32(4):324-30. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000144. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015. PMID: 26241242
-
Interrater agreement in the interpretation of neonatal electroencephalography in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.Epilepsia. 2017 Mar;58(3):429-435. doi: 10.1111/epi.13661. Epub 2017 Feb 6. Epilepsia. 2017. PMID: 28166364 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic significance of interictal epileptiform discharges in newly diagnosed seizure disorders.J Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;27(4):239-48. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181ea4288. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20634717 Review.
-
Electroencephalography in Epilepsy Evaluation.Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019 Apr;25(2):431-453. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000705. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019. PMID: 30921017 Review.
Cited by
-
Repetitive Electroencephalography as Biomarker for the Prediction of Survival in Patients with Post-Hypoxic Encephalopathy.J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 23;11(21):6253. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216253. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36362477 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning for EEG-based prognostication after cardiac arrest: from current research to future clinical applications.Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 24;14:1183810. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1183810. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37560450 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unveiling variability: A systematic review of reproducibility in visual EEG analysis, with focus on seizures.Epileptic Disord. 2024 Dec;26(6):827-839. doi: 10.1002/epd2.20291. Epub 2024 Sep 28. Epileptic Disord. 2024. PMID: 39340408 Free PMC article.
-
Competence of healthcare professionals performing electroencephalography test: A systematic review.Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2025 Mar 8;10:104-115. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.03.001. eCollection 2025. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2025. PMID: 40160931 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Machine learning algorithm for predicting seizure control after temporal lobe resection using peri-ictal electroencephalography.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 18;14(1):21771. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72249-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39294238 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rosenow, F. et al. Status epilepticus im Erwachsenenalter, S2k-Leitlinie, 2020, in: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (Hrsg.), Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. (Accessed December 2020); www.dgn.org/leitlinien.