Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13406.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92827-3.

Prospective evaluation of interrater agreement between EEG technologists and neurophysiologists

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective evaluation of interrater agreement between EEG technologists and neurophysiologists

Isabelle Beuchat et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

We aim to prospectively investigate, in a large and heterogeneous population, the electroencephalogram (EEG)-reading performances of EEG technologists. A total of 8 EEG technologists and 5 certified neurophysiologists independently analyzed 20-min EEG recordings. Interrater agreement (IRA) for predefined EEG pattern identification between EEG technologists and neurophysiologits was assessed using percentage of agreement (PA) and Gwet-AC1. Among 1528 EEG recordings, the PA [95% confidence interval] and interrater agreement (IRA, AC1) values were as follows: status epilepticus (SE) and seizures, 97% [96-98%], AC1 kappa = 0.97; interictal epileptiform discharges, 78% [76-80%], AC1 = 0.63; and conclusion dichotomized as "normal" versus "pathological", 83.6% [82-86%], AC1 = 0.71. EEG technologists identified SE and seizures with 99% [98-99%] negative predictive value, whereas the positive predictive values (PPVs) were 48% [34-62%] and 35% [20-53%], respectively. The PPV for normal EEGs was 72% [68-76%]. SE and seizure detection were impaired in poorly cooperating patients (SE and seizures; p < 0.001), intubated and older patients (SE; p < 0.001), and confirmed epilepsy patients (seizures; p = 0.004). EEG technologists identified ictal features with few false negatives but high false positives, and identified normal EEGs with good PPV. The absence of ictal features reported by EEG technologists can be reassuring; however, EEG traces should be reviewed by neurophysiologists before taking action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

IB: reports a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation. SA: reports no conflict of interest. PSR: reports personal fees from Eisai. NS: reports no conflict of interest. FR: reports personal fees from Arvelle Therapeutics, Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Medtronic, and UCB, and grants from the Detlev-Wrobel-Fonds for Epilepsy Research, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the LOEWE Program of the State of Hesse, and the European Union. AS: reports personal fees and grants from Arvelle Therapeutics, Desitin Arzneimittel, Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals companies, LivaNova, Marinus Pharma, Medtronic, UCB, and Zogenix.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentages of true positives (in dark green; EEG patterns coded “yes” by both EEG technologists and neurophysiologists), true negatives (in light green; EEG patterns coded “no” by both EEG technologists and neurophysiologists), false positives (in orange; exams coded “yes” by EEG technologists and “no” by neurophysiologists), and false negatives (in red; exams coded “no” by EEG technologists and “yes” by neurophysiologists). FN False negative, FP false positive, TP true positive, TN true negative, IEDS interictal epileptiform discharges, PDR posterior dominant rhythm, SE status epilepticus, Sz seizures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fisher RS, et al. Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:522–530. doi: 10.1111/epi.13670. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scheffer IE, et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:512–521. doi: 10.1111/epi.13709. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenow, F. et al. Status epilepticus im Erwachsenenalter, S2k-Leitlinie, 2020, in: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (Hrsg.), Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. (Accessed December 2020); www.dgn.org/leitlinien.
    1. Trinka E, et al. A definition and classification of status epilepticus—Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2015;56:1515–1523. doi: 10.1111/epi.13121. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strzelczyk A, Ansorge S, Hapfelmeier J, Bonthapally V, Erder MH, Rosenow F. Costs, length of stay, and mortality of super-refractory status epilepticus: A population-based study from Germany. Epilepsia. 2017;58(9):1533–1541. doi: 10.1111/epi.13837. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms