Prognostic values of D816V KIT mutation and peri-transplant CBFB-MYH11 MRD monitoring on acute myeloid leukemia with CBFB-MYH11
- PMID: 34183780
- DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01384-w
Prognostic values of D816V KIT mutation and peri-transplant CBFB-MYH11 MRD monitoring on acute myeloid leukemia with CBFB-MYH11
Abstract
Given the controversies in the prognostic value of KIT mutations and optimal thresholds and time points of MRD monitoring for AML with CBFB-MYH11, we retrospectively evaluated 88 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT, n = 60) or autologous HSCT (Auto-HSCT, n = 28). The D816V KIT mutation was significantly associated with post-transplant relapse, contrasting with other types of mutations in KIT. Pre- and post-transplant (3 months after transplant) CBFB-MYH11 MRD assessments were useful in predicting post-transplant relapse and poor survival. The optimal threshold was determined as a 2 log reduction at both time points. In multivariate analysis, the D816V KIT mutation and CBFB-MYH11 MRD assessments were independently associated with post-transplant relapse and survival. Stratification by D816V KIT and pre-transplant CBFB-MYH11 MRD status further distinguished the risk of relapse and survival. Auto-HSCT was superior to Allo-HSCT in MRD negative patients without D816V KIT, while Allo-HSCT trended to be superior to Auto-HSCT in patients with MRD positivity or the D816V KIT mutation. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the differentiated prognostic value of the D816V KIT mutation in AML with CBFB-MYH11 and clarified optimal time points and thresholds for CBFB-MYH11 MRD monitoring in the setting of HSCT.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic Impacts of D816V KIT Mutation and Peri-Transplant RUNX1-RUNX1T1 MRD Monitoring on Acute Myeloid Leukemia with RUNX1-RUNX1T1.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 18;13(2):336. doi: 10.3390/cancers13020336. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33477584 Free PMC article.
-
The loss or absence of minimal residual disease of <0·1% at any time after two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy in CBFB-MYH11-positive acute myeloid leukaemia indicates poor prognosis.Br J Haematol. 2021 Jan;192(2):265-271. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16745. Epub 2020 Jun 25. Br J Haematol. 2021. PMID: 32588434
-
Combination of KIT and FLT3-ITD mutation status with minimal residual disease levels guides treatment strategy for adult patients with inv(16) acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.Hematol Oncol. 2022 Oct;40(4):724-733. doi: 10.1002/hon.3015. Epub 2022 May 15. Hematol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35531760
-
How to Improve Prognostication in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with CBFB-MYH11 Fusion Transcript: Focus on the Role of Molecular Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Monitoring.Biomedicines. 2021 Aug 3;9(8):953. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9080953. Biomedicines. 2021. PMID: 34440157 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematological Malignancies Focusing on Acute Leukemia.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 28;20(21):5362. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215362. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31661875 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The consensus from The Chinese Society of Hematology on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 2021 update.J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Sep 15;14(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01159-2. J Hematol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34526099 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dohner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129:424–47. - DOI
-
- Jourdan E, Boissel N, Chevret S, Delabesse E, Renneville A, Cornillet P, et al. Prospective evaluation of gene mutations and minimal residual disease in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121:2213–23. - DOI
-
- Marcucci G, Mrozek K, Ruppert AS, Maharry K, Kolitz JE, Moore JO, et al. Prognostic factors and outcome of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21) differ from those of patients with inv(16): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5705–17. - DOI
-
- Schlenk RF, Benner A, Krauter J, Buchner T, Sauerland C, Ehninger G, et al. Individual patient data-based meta-analysis of patients aged 16 to 60 years with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a survey of the German Acute Myeloid Leukemia Intergroup. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3741–50. - DOI
-
- Mosna F, Papayannidis C, Martinelli G, Di Bona E, Bonalumi A, Tecchio C, et al. Complex karyotype, older age, and reduced first-line dose intensity determine poor survival in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients with long-term follow-up. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:515–23. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical