Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Mar;19(3):573-582.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13654. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Oncologic feasibility for negative pressure wound therapy application in surgical wounds: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Oncologic feasibility for negative pressure wound therapy application in surgical wounds: A meta-analysis

Yen-Jen Wang et al. Int Wound J. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) decreases postoperative complications of various surgeries. However, the use of NPWT for oncological surgical wounds remains controversial. To evaluate the association of NPWT with oncologic recurrence in surgical wounds without residual malignancy, we analysed studies that compared NPWT with conventional non-pressure dressings for cancer surgical wounds without residual tumour by August 12, 2020. We compared tumour recurrence rates and postoperative complications between the two procedures. The six studies included 118 patients who received NPWT, and 149 patients who received conventional non-pressure wound care. The overall quality of the included studies was high based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale score of 7.5. Tumour recurrence after NPWT was not significantly different compared with conventional non-negative pressure wound care (9.3% versus 11.4%, P = 0.40). There was no significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 3%). Although NTWT was associated with a lower complication rate compared with the control group, the result was non-significant (P = 0.15). Application of NPWT in oncologic resection wounds without residual malignancy revealed no difference in local recurrence and may reduce the risk of postoperative complications compared with conventional non-negative pressure dressings. NPWT can be considered an alternative method for reconstruction in challenging cases.

Keywords: malignant neoplasms; melanoma; negative-pressure wound therapy; recurrence; sarcoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow chart
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot shows the relative risk (RR) of “tumour non‐recurrence rate.” A random‐effects model was used to compare the RR between NPWT and conventional non‐negative pressure dressings
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot shows the relative risk (RR) of “non‐complication rate.” A random‐effects model was used to compare the RR between NPWT and conventional non‐negative pressure dressings

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li HZ, Xu XH, Wang DW, Lin YM, Lin N, Lu HD. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(11):1328‐1338. - PubMed
    1. Ge D. The safety of negative‐pressure wound therapy on surgical wounds: an updated meta‐analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018;31(9):421‐428. - PubMed
    1. Cirocchi R, Birindelli A, Biffl WL, et al. What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):575‐584. - PubMed
    1. Atema JJ, Gans SL, Boermeester MA. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non‐trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39(4):912‐925. - PubMed
    1. Shiroky J, Lillie E, Muaddi H, Sevigny M, Choi WJ, Karanicolas PJ. The impact of negative pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions on surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Surgery. 2020;167(6):1001‐1009. - PubMed

Publication types